Personal Introduction/Dr. Lambert

William T. (Bill) Lambert, Sr., EdDWilliam Tullis (Bill) Lambert, Sr., EdD

Minister of the Gospel and Professor Emeritus (New Testament Literature and Interpretation), Harding University

Personal Background:

– Born on a farm in Lawrence County, Mississippi, to Troy E. Lambert (carpenter and farmer) and Susannah Tullis Lambert (homemaker and seamstress), January 8, 1937

– Grew up in Lawrence and Walthall counties on farms near Monticello and Tylertown, Mississippi with brothers Joseph Jones, Jake Edward, and Troy Terrell.

Educational Background:

– Graduated from Tylertown High School in 1956.

– Earned Associate of Arts in Bible at Freed-Hardeman College, 1956-1958

Took a special “Advanced Bible Program” at Freed-Hardeman 1958-59.

– After two more years course work, received the Bachelor of Arts Degree with a double major in Greek and Bible (minors in English, History, Philosophy, and Psychology) from Belhaven College (Jackson, MS) in 1970.

– Awarded the Master of Arts Degree in English from Mississippi College, with a focus on grammar (thesis project: Rules of Verb Auxiliaries for Translating Greek Verbs into Precise and Comprehensive English Verb Phrases), 1981, and did post-masters work in English at MC, Counseling at Mississippi State, Jackson, and Hebrew at Reformed Theological Seminary, Jackson.

– Received the Doctor of Education Degree in College Teaching, from the University of Arkansas, 1991, with a focus on College teaching of Greek and Biblical Interpretation. Dissertation project: An Adaptive-Mastery System of Teaching Biblical Language and Biblical Interpretation. This required two dissertation committees – external committee from select theological seminaries and graduate schools of religion to evaluate Bible and Greek component and committee of UA faculty to evaluate educational component and approve total project.

– Made study tours in Rome, Greece, Egypt, Syria, Jordan, Palestine, England, and Japan.

Church-Ministry Background:

– Have preached in churches of Christ since 1952 (Preaching and Church Ministry)–Tennessee (as college student), Mississippi, Indiana, Arkansas. Greater Jackson, Mississippi, 20 years; Searcy, Arkansas area 40 years.

– Served as volunteer and church sponsored chaplain and Bible teacher in retirement and nursing homes for at least forty-seven years–at Harding Place weekly (1998 to 2011), sponsored by College Church of Christ, and The Crossing at Riverside Nursing and Rehabilitation Center as volunteer 2009 to 2020.

– Edited two monthly religious papers (The Restoration Plea and The Bible Way) with distributions of over 5,000 for over five years. Also had articles on ministry and biblical teachings published in several religious magazines. – Preached on daily radio programs for at least ten years.

– Speaker on a weekly television program in Jackson, Mississippi for almost twenty years (preaching, interviewing guests, and answering questions written and called in by listeners).

– Served as an Elder in churches of Christ for 12 years in Jackson, MS, and 2 years in Searcy, AR.

– Preached and Taught the Bible in Germany, The Bahamas, Saudi Arabia (to Non-Saudi Expatriates), Kenya, Mexico, Belarus, Singapore, Malaysia, and Italy.

Christian Educator Background:

– Taught New Testament, Greek, and Ministry and served as Academic Dean, Interim President, and Vice president of Academic Affairs for Magnolia Bible College, Kosciusko, MS (1976-1982)

– Taught English, Greek, Preaching, New Testament Text, and Biblical Interpretation at Harding University for twenty-five years (1982-2008)

– Served as Director of Harding University School of Biblical Studies (1990-96)

– Led college students on short-term mission trips in Singapore, East Malaysia, Mexico, and Belarus.

Family Information:

Married to Dr. Helen Carter Lambert, former Associate Dean and Professor Emeritus, Harding University College of Nursing, since 1957.

Two Sons – William T. Lambert, Jr., MCC, MS, MFT, Minister of the Gospel, Counselor, and Marriage and Family Therapist, Mississippi, TN, . and Carter E. Lambert, Phd., Head Master of Christian schools in Campbell, California and Houston, Texas, and President of Central Arkansas Christian Schools in Little Rock, Arkansas, 21 year.

One Daughter – Joanna (Mrs. Ken Berry), MS, MFT, Homemaker, Counselor, and Marriage and Family Therapist, Little Rock, AR, Carmel, NY.

Eight Grandchildren and Eight Great Grandchildren

Slogan: “Not to be served, but to serve” (Mark 10:45).

Personal Mission: Submit to God and let Him work His will in my life.

Posted in Personal Information | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Personal Introduction/Dr. Lambert

Biblical Translations/Comparing Translations in Bible Study

Studying the Biblical Text by Comparing Translations
William T. (Bill) Lambert, Ed D
Professor Emeritus, New Testament Literature and Interpretation, Harding University

Is it fair to God (or safe for us) to base our belief system, our moral culture, how we worship, or what we do in service to God on a carless and shallow study of the Bible? Serious Bible study involves much thought, time, and work. We cannot know how to apply biblical teachings to our lives until we know what the Bible means; we cannot know what the Bible means until we know what the Bible says; and we cannot know what the Bible really says without giving the time and effort to serious Bible study. Digging for gold is hard work and time consuming, but, when we strike gold, it’s worth the effort. Serious Bible study is appropriate because the Bible is God speaking!

A biblical text is a composition written by a person chosen by God. This biblical writer wrote under the supervision and control of the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit that searches even “the deep things of God” and reveals God’s thoughts reveals the mind of God (1 Cor. 2:9-13). So, biblical statements are the Word of God—God speaking to us. Therefore, biblical statements deserve to be studied prayerfully, ¬rationally, and thoroughly!

The following obvious matters related to the communication of a biblical concept and its meaning should be given serious consideration. A document is made up of letters of the alphabet that form words; words that form phrases, clauses, and sentences. Sentences form paragraphs; and paragraphs form documents.
In the Bible documents are written to set forth a truth claim. The truth claim of a document is its thesis (i.e., main point or big idea) —the point of truth God wants to pass on to us. The thesis (i.e., main truth-claim) of a document is developed by the words, phrases, clauses, sentences, and paragraphs that make up the document. Each of these smaller parts (i.e., words, phrases, clauses, sentences, and paragraphs) of a document serves to either explain, illustrate, or prove the thesis or truth-claim made by the document.

If we are to thoroughly understand the truth-claim of a document, we must understand the meaning of each of these smaller parts. So, to be thorough and independent in our Bible study, we must give attention to the meaning of each word, phrase, clause, sentence, and paragraph.
Precise and complete understanding of a biblical text depends on a clear understanding of the meaning of words and how they are grammatically and syntactically put together (especially key words in a text). The verb and subject are probably the most important key words in a sentence. Also, we must understand the function of each phrase and each clause in each sentence. Likewise, we must understand the meaning and function of every sentence and every paragraph in the document. However, modifying words can also be keys to understanding precise meaning.

The subject is key because it names what the sentence is all about. The verb is key because it makes a statement about the subject. Modifiers are key because they can both limit and expand. They limit a claim to particular kinds (i.e., which one, what kind, and how many) or specific conditions (i.e., when, where, why).
Word meaning is usually a combination of the (1) denotations, i.e., the general field of meaning of the word and (2) connotation, i.e., a meaning that is tied to the denotation but modified by grammar (e.g., person, number, gender, and case in nouns, and tense, voice, and mood in verbs).

Also, viewing the meaning of a text in context is an essential. The immediate context, book context, historical context, canonical context, and theological context, all seriously effect meaning. For example, if an interpretation contradicts the nature of God/Christ or the purpose of Christianity, it violates the ¬¬theological context. If an interpretation contradicts clear teaching in other texts, it is obviously a wrong interpretation. Also, if a word, phrase, sentence, or paragraph is applied to a totally different situation than the one at hand (i.e., the problem, need, question, etc.), it will be given a meaning that violates God’s truth intent for the passage.

Our understanding of what words in a text mean can be both expanded and sharpened by comparing translations. When comparing translations, we should consider what kind of translations we are using. When classified according to who produced the translation, there are three basic kinds: (1) private translations (produced by one or two individuals, (2) denominational translations (produced by a small committee representing one particular denomination), and (3) standard translations (produced by a large committee of recognized scholars from various theological traditions or denominational backgrounds).
There are two basic approaches to translating the word of God. When classified according to approach, we have two classes of translations. (1) A formal-correspondence translation is an effort to give a word-for-word translation and maintain a form in sentences that corresponds to or is nearly the same as the form of the original Hebrew and Greek texts. This type of translation is more difficult to understand by English readers. (2) A dynamic-equivalent translation is more concerned with conveying the idea of the text (the idea as understood by the writer and the first readers, original recipients) than with word-for-word or form. Translations produced by this approach are largely paraphrases and more open to being more an interpretation than a translation–more open to personal beliefs or theological preconceptions creeping in.

To be fair, one English word often cannot adequately translate the rich full meaning of a Greek or Hebrew word. This is especially true when we attempt to reflect grammatical and contextual implications in our translation. Consequently, often translators must use a phrase or clause instead of just one word to adequately translate a word in the original language. The formal correspondence translation is more likely to be ambiguous (i.e., open to more than one meaning) or unclear. On the other hand, although usually more clearly stated, the dynamic equivalent translation is more open to bias and preconception and sometimes results in an excessively free paraphrase. Therefore, translation should be performed with great care and a system of checks-and-balances operative in the process.

When asked about which translation I would recommend, I ask, “For whom?” Of course, I would always recommend only translations that are true to the original. However, translations are produced for people with different levels of verbal skills or use of the English language. Some translations are best for (1) people with a high level of formal education; (2) others for intelligent people with less formal education; (3) and yet others for those who use English as a second language. Because of these differences, translations will differ in three basic ways: word use, sentence length, and paragraph lengths. Translations for people with a higher-level of education usually use more complicated words, longer compound and complex sentences, and form paragraphs that focus around larger thought units containing several smaller thought units. On the other hand, translations intended for those with less education or those using English as a second language use simpler words, shorter simple sentences, and smaller thought units as shorter paragraphs.

Private Translations
So far as translations that are closer to the original language or less near the original text familiar to the writer and first readers, the following is true. Private translations are the products of individual efforts at translation. The translator may or may not be a scholar with knowledge of biblical language, culture, translation theory, and linguistics. Private translations have two serious weaknesses. First, they often reflect less scholarship than standard translations. Sometimes they demonstrate a simplistic approach to the grammar of biblical languages.

Some who translate apply the basics of the grammar of the original language without consideration of various syntactical essentials dictated by context. Also, a lack of depth in the grammar of their own language leads to a failure to adequately express the propositional significance of the grammar (i.e., the significance of tense, voice, mood and case) of the original.

In verb tense, there are indications of time of the action or state, duration of the action or state, and duration of the effect of the action or state of being. In the mood of verbs, there are indications of levels of reality, e.g., reality, probability, possibility.

In the voice of verbs, there are indications of whether the subject is acting, being acted upon by someone else, or performing an act upon self. The case of nouns indicate whether the subject is acting or being acted upon, the benefactor for whom the action is performed, the location of action, the agency through which the action is performed, etc.

Many who attempt private translations are not adequately knowledgeable in original languages, translation theory, or even their own language. Even at best, the scholarship of one good scholar does not compare to the combined scholarship of a committee of scholars.
In addition, private translations lack the checks and balances provided by a committee of scholars from varied religious backgrounds. Consequently, these translations tend to reflect the religious biases of their translators.

When a large committee of scholars from varied theological backgrounds translate, they tend to prevent one another from putting theological biases into the resulting translation. However, this sometimes prevents them from giving full expression to the original language for fear of offending other members of the committee. They even sometimes simply transliterate words, i.e., write the original word in English letters. For example, baptize is not a translation of the Greek word baptizo; it is a transliteration. Some committee members might be offended by the literal meaning of baptizo–immerse or submerge. A trustworthy private translation might be more expressive and clarify that which is ambiguous or unclear in “standard translations.”

Denominational Translations
Small committees representing single religious affiliations and their denominational biases produce denominational translations. Also, the members of these committees may or may not be experts in biblical languages, linguistics, and translation theory. But, as you would suspect, their translations are in danger of having the same weaknesses as private translations. (1) They usually do not reflect the scholarship of a large committee, especially the combined scholarship of a large committee. (2) Also, they lack the checks-and-balances of varied theological backgrounds and, as you might imagine, tend to reflect doctrinal biases common to their denominational affiliation.

Standard Translations
Reasonably large committees of recognized scholars in Hebrew and Greek, linguistics, culture, English language, and translation theory usually produce standard translations. These scholars consider carefully what communication acts meant to their first readers in their cultural, religious, political, and personal contexts. They also translate in words and phrases that best convey the same meaning to their targeted readers in their cultural, religious, political, and personal contexts. Moreover, the variety of theological preferences among them usually provides the checks-and-balances needed to minimize religious bias.
Standard translations have two important advantages over private and denominational translations. (1) They are supported by greater scholarship. The individuals on the committee are usually (not always) more highly recognized as scholars than those who work on private and denominational translations. In addition, the combined scholarship of the scholars who make up the large committees that give us standard translations is much greater than that of the one or few who produce private and denominational translations. (2) Standard translations reflect less bias than the others. The committees that give us standard translations are made up of scholars from many different religious traditions. They serve as checks-and-balances to each other and prevent theological biases in translations.
Standard translations do reflect one weakness. In an effort to achieve a consensus and to avoid offending anyone on the committee from any religious tradition, they often use general, ambiguous, and unclear terms. Sometimes, they even simply transliterate the word in the original text into English (not translate) to achieve consensus or to avoid the risk offending committee members whose theology might be called into question by a clear and explicit translation.

Considering the above, when comparing translations, you should use a standard translation as a basic study text. Comparing other more expressive and emphatic translations will add to the word meaning revealed in standard translations. Such comparative texts can be helpful when they expand the meaning found in standard translations. However, when a comparative text contradicts a standard translation, the nonstandard translation should be questioned and a more thorough investigation through lexical and usage studies should be conducted.
The bottom line is that standard translations should be preferred over private and denominational translations. In fact, the reason for in-depth word studies is usually one or both of the following: (1) the need to have a more thorough understanding of what the Scripture teaches in a text or about a theme or subject; (2) a conflict of meaning assigned to words and phrases reflected from one translation to another.

When I began in-depth Bible study (and in my early-years of teaching “How to Study the Bible,” “Biblical Hermeneutics,” or “Biblical Interpretation,” to compare translations required having several translations opened to a text and laid out before me on a desk or table. But, now there are computer programs designed for biblical research. We can type in the text we want to study and open it on the computer screen. Then we can open parallel translations—even the text in the original Greek or Hebrew. We can look at these texts side-by-side and compare the texts. Even those who never studied the original language can see the Greek or Hebrew word highlighted, a lexical definition, and an analysis of the word. So, study by comparing translations is made easier for today’s Bible students. I use “Accordance” search program.

What you may take away from this article: 1. Three basic kinds of biblical translations as classified according to who produced them. 2. Advantages and disadvantages of each of the above kind of translation. 3. Two basic approaches to biblical translations classified according to the form a translation takes. 4. Why a word-for-word translation is sometimes not clear. 5. The reasons for differences in translations related to levels of education. 6. Three ways translations might differ when considering various levels of education. 7. How modern technology or biblical-search computer programs make comparing translations much easier.


©William T. (Bill) Lambert, EdD, 11/2017
Professor Emeritus, New Testament Literature, Harding University
504 East Center Avenue
Searcy, AR 72143

Posted in How to Study the Bible, Uncategorized | Comments Off on Biblical Translations/Comparing Translations in Bible Study

Hebrews: Message Outlined/Argument

HEBREWS: Message Outlined/Argument

Author – It is uncertain who wrote Hebrews. The following are some of my observations.

  1. The message and literary style have led many to think Hebrews was written by Paul.
  2. Even though the vocabulary is not the same as that of Paul in his known letters, that would seem reasonable to expect. Paul was well educated in the culture and customs of the Jews as well as the Gentile population. Adapting to his audience, Paul would naturally change his vocabulary to appeal to a Jewish audience.
  3. So much is like Paul in the treatise, it could have been written by one of Paul’s close associates like Barnabas or Apollos or Paul and one of these coworkers.

Occasion – Christians were turning back from Christianity to Judaism and other former ways of life.
Thesis – Christianity is superior to Judaism and other ways of life, so do not turn back to Judaism or a pagan way of life.
Purpose – The writer sought to show that Christianity is superior because of the person of Christ.

I. Jesus Christ is superior to the angels through whom Judaism was
established (1:1-2:4).
A. He is the Son of God, but angels are servants (1:1-2:4).
B. Being made lower than the angels aided His superiority
rather than diminishing it (2:5-18).


II. Jesus is superior to Moses and the prophets (3:1-4:13).
A. As builder and Son He is superior to Moses who is a
servant in the house.
B. A warning from history (3:7- 4:13)


III. Jesus is superior to the priests of the Levitical order (4:14-8:5)
A. Christ maintains the strengths and eliminates the
weaknesses of the Levitical order (4:14-5:10).
B. Admonition and warning (5:11-6:20).
C. Christ a priest after the order of Melchizedek (7:1-28).
D. The main point is that we have a perfect priesthood (8:1-
5).

IV. Christianity provides a superior covenant (8:6-10:18)
A. It is a perfect covenant with better benefits (8:6-13).
B. It provides the real things (9:1-10:18).

V. Exhortations and warnings based on the superiority of Christ (10:19-13:25)
A. Exhort one another to avoid the judgment (10:19-39).
B. Faith has sustaining power (11:1- 40).
C. In Christ, we can have confidence and exercise
perseverance (12:1-28).
D. This superior religion should lead to a superior way of life
(13:1-25).

William T. (Bill) Lambert, Ed D
Professor Emeritus, New Testament Literature and Interpretation
Harding University

Posted in Textual Studies, Textual Studies, Uncategorized | Comments Off on Hebrews: Message Outlined/Argument

Hebrews Text and Notes

Heb. 1:1 In the past God spoke √to our forefathers √through the prophets at √many times and in √various ways, 2 but in these last days √he has spoken to us by his Son,

God Has Spoken

I To our forefathers
A. In the past
B. Through the prophets
C. At many times
D. In various ways
II. To us
A. In these last days
B. Through a Son
1. Whom he appointed heir of all things
2. Through whom he made the universe


How God Speaks to man
1. In the Past vs In These Last Days
2. To Our Fathers vs To Us
3. Through the Prophets vs Through Jesus
4. Many Times vs One Time
5. In Various Ways vs In One Way

whom he √appointed heir of all things, and through whom he √made the universe. 3 The Son is √the radiance of God’s glory and the √exact representation of his being, √sustaining all things by his powerful word. After he had √provided purification for sins, he √sat down at the right hand of the Majesty in heaven.

JESUS CHRIST
1. Appointed heir of all things
2. Made the universe
3. The radiance of God’s glory
4. Exact representation of God’s being
5. Sustains all things by his word
6. Provided purification for sins
7. Sat down on the right hand of
God in heaven
4 So he became as much SUPERIOR TO THE ANGELS as the name he has inherited is superior to theirs.

Heb. 1:5 For to which of the angels did God ever say, √“You are my Son; today I have become your Father”? Or again, “I will be his Father, and he will be my Son”? 6 And again, when God brings his firstborn into the world, he says, √“Let all God’s angels worship him.” 7 In speaking of the angels he says, “He makes his angels winds, √his servants flames of fire.” 8 But about the Son he says, √“Your throne, O God, will last for ever and ever, and righteousness will be the √scepter of your kingdom. 9 You have loved righteousness and hated wickedness; therefore God, your √God, has set you above your companions by anointing you with the oil of joy.” 10 He also says, “In the beginning, O Lord, you √laid the foundations of the earth, and the heavens are the work of your hands. 11 They will perish, but √you remain; they will all wear out like a garment. 12 You will roll them up like a robe; like a garment they will be changed. But √you remain the same, and your years will never end.” 13 To which of the angels did God ever say, √“Sit at my right hand until I make your enemies a footstool for your feet”? 14 Are not all √angels ministering spirits sent to serve those who will inherit salvation?

Christ Superior to Angels
1:3-14
1. Superior Name—Son of God (4-5)
2. Angels to Worship Him (6)
3. Angels – Servants (7)
4. Called Jesus God.
5. As God has a Throne and Kingdom (8)
6. Set above His Companions (9)
7. Laid Foundations of Earth (10)
8. Eternal – Creation will Perish (11-12)
9. Sits on the right hand of God (13)
10. Angels Serve His Heirs (14)

Heb. 2:1 We must √pay more careful attention, therefore, to what we have heard, so that we do not √drift away. 2 For if the √message spoken by angels was binding, and √every violation and disobedience received its just punishment, 3 how shall we escape if we ignore such a √great salvation? This salvation, which was √first announced by the Lord, was √confirmed to us by those who heard him. 4 √God also testified to it by signs, wonders and various miracles, and gifts of the Holy Spirit distributed according to his will.

WHY WE MUST PAY CLOSE ATTENTION TO CHRIST

1. Christ is greater than the angels.
2. To keep from drifting away
3. Those who neglect it cannot escape punishment.
4. It is such a great salvation.
5. It was first spoken by the Lord.
6. It was confirmed to us by those who heard Him.
7. God bore witness to it with signs, wonders, and various miracles.

God Speaks through Jesus

1. First spoken by Jesus.
2. Confirmed by those who heard him.
3. God bearing witness through signs, wonders and miraculous gifts of the Holy Spirit.
See 1 Cor. 2:6-13; Acts 2:1-4; 2 Tim. 3:14-17

The Word has been confirmed by God through signs and miracles.
Heb. 2:1-4

I. When Jesus went back to the Father, his revelation was not complete, but the Holy Spirit will complete it (Jn. 16:5, 12-15)

II. The Holy Spirit will perform four works (Jn. 16:13; 14:25-26).
A. Teach them all things
B. Remind them of all Jesus had said
C. Guide them into ALL truth
D. Tell them what was yet to come

III. Three primary activities of the Holy Spirit in Guiding them into all truth
A. Revelation (1 Cor. 2:6-16)
B. Bear witness to the message with miraculous activity (Heb. 2:2-4)
C. Gift of inspiration (2 Tim. 3:16-17)

IV. Example of this activity in Acts
A. Revelation (1:4-5, 9, 22; 1:26-2:8, 42)
B. Miraculous witness (2:43; 3:1-8; 5:12; 6:5-8; 8:6, 13, 14-19)

V. Duration of these miracles
A. Only Apostles could convey these gifts to anyone else (8:14-19)
B. To cease when “that which was perfect had come” (1 Cor. 13:8-12)
1. “know in part” and “prophesy in part” (9)
2. “But”
3. ‘when that which is perfect is come”
4. “that which is in part will be done away” (10)
a. “prophecies . . . will cease” (8; cf. 12:7-11))
b. “tongues . . . will be stilled” (8)
c. “knowledge . . . will pass away” (8)

Heb. 2:5 It is not to angels that he √has subjected the world to come, about which we are speaking. 6 But there is a place where someone has testified: “WHAT IS MAN THAT YOU ARE MINDFUL OF HIM, THE SON OF MAN THAT YOU CARE FOR HIM? 7 You √made him a little lower than the angels; you √crowned him with glory and honor 8 and √put everything under his feet.” In putting everything under him, God left nothing that is not subject to him. √Yet at present we do not see everything subject to him. 9 √But we see Jesus, who was √made a little lower than the angels, now √crowned with glory and honor because √he suffered death, so that by the grace of God he might taste death for everyone.

Heb. 2:10 In √bringing many sons to glory, it was fitting that God, for whom and through whom everything exists, should √make the author of their salvation perfect through suffering. 11 Both the one who makes men holy and those who are made holy are of √the same family. So Jesus is not ashamed to √call them brothers. 12 He says, “I will declare your name to my brothers; in the presence of the congregation I will sing your praises.” 13 And again, “I will put my trust in him.” And again he says, “Here am I, and √the children God has given me.”

Lower than the Angels, but still Greater than the Angels

1. God did not subject the “world to come to angels” (5).
2. God did subject the world to man (6).
3. God made man a little lower than the angels (7).
4. He crowned him with glory and honor (7).
5. He put everything under his feet, and left nothing not subject to him (7-8).
6. At present we do not see all things subject to him (7).
7. BUT, we see Jesus . . . (9).
a. He is crowned with glory and honor.
b. He suffered death – to taste death for every man.
8. God brought many sons to glory through the suffering of Christ (10).
9. God made the pioneer of our salvation perfect through suffering (10).
10. We are one with Him.
11. He calls us brother (11).
12. We are the “children God has given” to Him (13).

Heb. 2:14 Since the children have flesh and blood, √he too shared in their humanity so that √by his death he might destroy him who holds the power of death — that is, the devil — 15 and √free those who all their lives were held in slavery by their fear of death. 16 For surely it is not angels he helps, but Abraham’s descendants. 17 For this reason √he had to be made like his brothers in every way, in order that he might become a √merciful and faithful high priest in service to God, and that he √might make atonement for the sins of the people. 18 √Because he himself suffered when he was tempted, he is able to help those who are being tempted.

Heb. 2:14 ¶ Since the children have flesh and blood, he too shared in their humanity (1) so that by his death he might destroy him who holds the power of death — that is, the devil —[cf. Rom. 7:14ff; 8:7-8; Eph. 1:7; 2:14-18; Rom. 8:1-2, 9] 15 and (2) free those who all their lives were held in slavery by their fear of death. [1 Cor. 15:54-57; Phil. 1:21-23] 16 (3) For surely it is not angels he helps, but Abraham’s descendants. [Phil. 1:6; Eph. 3:20; 1 Tim. 1:12; 1 Pet. 5:6-7] 17 For this reason he had to be made like his brothers in every way, (4) in order that he might become a merciful and faithful high priest in service to God, [cf. 4:15; 5:1-2] and (5) that he might make atonement for the sins of the people. [cf. v. 9; Rom. 6:23; 3:23-26; Gal. 2:20] 18 (6) Because he himself suffered when he was tempted, he is able to help those who are being tempted.


Why Jesus Became Flesh
1. So that by his death he could destroy the devil (14).
a. The devil’s power is in sin and death.
b. Christ died to destroy sin and give life.
c. The death of Christ led to his resurrection from death.
2. So that he might free man from slavery to the fear of death (15).
a. Christ assured us of the resurrection.
b. Christ assured us of heaven after death.
3. To help Abraham’s descendants (16).
a. Jesus offers us help.
b. He cares for us.
c. He works in us.
f. He is able to do more than we wan ask or think.
4. To become a merciful and faithful high priest (17).
a. Having suffered as we do, he is able to help us (2:18).
b. He feels for us (4:15).
c. He deals gently with us when we are misled (5:1-2).
5. To make atonement for the sins of his people (17).
a. The wage of sin is death (Rm. 1:32; 6:23).
b. He tasted death for all of us (v. 9).
c. He paid our sin debt (Rm. 3:23-26; Gal. 2:20).
6. To suffer and be able to help those who are tempted (18).

We must focus on Jesus and what He says above what anyone else, even angels, have to say.

Heb. 3:1 Therefore, holy brothers, who share in the √heavenly calling, fix your thoughts on Jesus, the √apostle and √high priest whom we confess.

Ministry of Jesus
1. Apostle
2. High Priest

Christ is greater than Moses and the other prophets, so Christianity is greater than Judaism.


2 He was faithful to the one who appointed him, just as √Moses was faithful in all God’s house. Jesus has been found worthy of greater honor than Moses, just as √the builder of a house has greater honor than the house itself. 4 For √√EVERY HOUSE IS BUILT BY SOMEONE, BUT GOD IS THE BUILDER OF EVERYTHING. 5 √Moses was faithful as a servant in all God’s house, testifying to what would be said in the future. 6 But √Christ is faithful as a son over God’s house. And √we are his house, if we hold on to our courage and the hope of which we boast.

Note: When we see a house, we know someone designed it, and someone built it. Therefore, when we behold this vast universe and how all parts of it work together, we know it has a mighty designer and builder!


Christ and Moses

1. Moses was a servant in the house.
2. Christ is a son over the house.

Be careful that you don’t fail to enter the rest God has for His faithful.


Heb. 3:7 So, as √the Holy Spirit says: “Today, if you hear his voice, 8 √do not harden your hearts as you did in the rebellion, during the time of testing in the desert, 9 where your fathers tested and tried me and for forty years saw what I did. 10 That is why √I was angry with that generation, and I said, ‘Their hearts are always going astray, and they have not known my ways.’ 11 So I declared on oath in my anger, √‘They shall never enter my rest.’”

Heb. 3:12 See to it, brothers, that none of you has √a sinful, unbelieving heart that turns away from the living God. 13 But √encourage one another daily, as long as it is called Today, so that none of you may be √hardened by sin’s deceitfulness. 14 We have come to share in Christ √if we hold firmly till the end the confidence we had at first. 15 As has just been said: “Today, if you hear his voice, do not √harden your hearts as you did in the rebellion.”

Heb. 3:16 Who were they who heard and rebelled? Were they not all those Moses led out of Egypt? 17 √And with whom was he angry for forty years? Was it not with those who sinned, whose bodies fell in the desert? 18 And to whom did God swear that they would never enter his rest if not to those who √disobeyed? 19 So we see that they were not able to enter, because of their √unbelief.

1. The Holy Spirit warns against failure to enter (7).
2. Hardness of heart kept Israel from the rest (7).
3. God was angry over their straying hearts (10).
4. God said Israel would never enter his rest (11).
5. We must be careful not to allow an evil heart to turn us from God (12),
6. We must encourage one another daily to prevent being hardened by sin’s deceitfulness (13).
7. Our entering the rest is conditioned on our holding firmly our first confidence (14).
8. The ones Moses led out of Egypt rebelled and made God angry for forty years (16-17).
9. Those who disobeyed did not enter the rest because of their unbelief (18-19).

Heb. 4:1 Therefore, since √the promise of entering his rest still stands, let us be careful that none of you be found to have fallen short of it. 2 For we also have had the gospel preached to us, just as they did; but √the message they heard was of no value to them, because those who heard did not combine it with faith. 3 √Now we who have believed enter that rest, just as God has said, “So I declared on oath in my anger, ‘They shall never enter my rest.’” And yet his work has been finished since the creation of the world. 4 For somewhere he has spoken about the seventh day in these words: √√“And on the seventh day God rested from all his work.” 5 And again in the passage above he says, “They shall never enter my rest.”

Heb. 4:6 √It still remains that some will enter that rest, and √those who formerly had the gospel preached to them did not go in, because of their disobedience. (cf. v. 2). 7 Therefore God again set a certain day, calling it Today, when a long time later he spoke through David, as was said before: √“Today, if you hear his voice, do not harden your hearts.” 8 For √if Joshua had given them rest, God would not have spoken later about another day. 9 There remains, then, a Sabbath-rest for the people of God; 10 for anyone who enters God’s rest also rests from his own work, just as God did from his. 11 √Let us, therefore, make every effort to enter that rest, so that no one will fall by following their example of disobedience.

Be careful that none of us fall short of the rest.
4:1-11
1. Therefore – This caution is raised because of the fact that masses under Moses did not enter their rest because of their disobedience, which is unbelief (3:12-19).
2. A rest still remains, and we could fall short of it as those under Moses fell short of their promised rest (v. 1).
3. The gospel could keep us from falling short of our rest (v. 2).
a. We have had it preached to us–as they did.
b. The gospel is of no value to us if not combined with faith.
c. Those who believe will enter that rest (v. 3).
4. God wants his people to have a rest.
a. Moses and Joshua offered a rest.
1) Some entered that rest.
2) Some did not enter because of unbelief (vv. 2-3).
b. Even God ceased his labor on the seventh day—rested (v. 4).
c. God promises his people that we will rest or cease from labor as he did (vv. 6, 10).
5. The rest offered by Joshua was not the final rest (vv. 6, 8-9).
a. God offered his people a rest in the days of Joshua.
b. He later offered a rest through David to those in the “Promised Land” (v. 7).
c. If the rest offered in Joshua’s day had been the final rest, there would have been no place for a rest to be offered by David.
1) The rest offered by David was to those already in the rest promised by Moses and Joshua.
2) The rest promised by David is the rest to which we look —heaven.
6. We must make every effort to enter our rest, so that no one will fall because of disobedience (v. 11).


Heb. 4:12 For the √word of God is living and active. Sharper than any double-edged sword, it penetrates even to dividing soul and spirit, joints and marrow; it judges the thoughts and attitudes of the heart. 13 √Nothing in all creation is hidden from God’s sight √Everything is uncovered and laid bare before the eyes of him to whom we must give account.

Make every effort to enter the rest and not to fall through disobedience: Don’t disobey! (4:12-13)

Reasons to obey God’s Word

1. The nature of the word of God (v. 12)
2. God knows everything (v. 13).
3. We must give account to God (v. 13).

Heb. 4:14 Therefore, since √we have a great high priest who has gone through the heavens, Jesus the Son of God, let us hold firmly to the faith we profess. 15 √For we do not have a high priest who is unable to sympathize with our weaknesses, but we have one who has been tempted in every way, just as we are — yet was without sin. 16 Let us then approach the throne of grace with √confidence, so that we may √receive mercy and find grace to help us in our time of need.


Hold Firmly to the Faith
4:14-16

1. We have a high priest who has gone through the heavens—Jesus the Son of God (v. 14).

2. We have a high priest that can sympathize with our weaknesses (v. 15).

3. Therefore, let us approach the throne of grace with confidence (v. 16).

a. Thus, we receive mercy.

b. Thus, we receive grace to help in our time of need.


Heb. 5:1 Every √HIGH PRIEST is √selected from among men and is appointed to represent them in matters related to God, to offer gifts and sacrifices for sins. 2 He is √able to deal gently with those who are ignorant and are going astray, since √he himself is subject to weakness. 3 This is why he √has to offer sacrifices for his own sins, as well as for the sins of the people.

High Priesthood
(Heb. 5:1-4)

1. Appointed from among men (1)
2. Represents men in matters related to God (1).
3. Offers gifts and sacrifices (1)
4. Able to deal gently with the ignorant and misled (2)
5. Subject to weakness (2)
6. Had to offer sacrifice for his own sins (3; cf. 7:26-28)
7. Appointed by God, not self (4)

Heb. 5:4 No one takes this honor upon himself; he √must be called by God, just as Aaron was.

5 So √Christ also did not take upon himself the glory of becoming a high priest. But God said to him, “You are my Son; today I have become your Father.” 6 And he says in another place, √“You are a priest forever, in the order of Melchizedek.”

Heb. 5:7 During the days of Jesus’ life on earth, he √offered up prayers and petitions with loud cries and tears to the one who could save him from death, and √he was heard because of his reverent submission. 8 Although he was a son, √he learned obedience from what he suffered 9 and, once made perfect, he √became the source of eternal salvation for all who obey him 10 and was designated by God to be √high priest in the order of Melchizedek.


Christ as Priest
5:5-10
1. God appointed him (5-6).
2. He prayed not to die, and God heard him (7).
3. As a son, he learned obedience through suffering (8).
4. Was made perfect by his obedience (9).
5. Became the source of eternal salvation (9).
6. Saves those who obey him (9).
7. God designated him a priest just like Melchizedek (10).

Heb. 5:11 We have much to say about this, but it is √hard to explain √√because you are slow to learn. 12 In fact, though √by this time you ought to be teachers, √you need someone to teach you the elementary truths of God’s word all over again. You need milk, not solid food! 13 Anyone who lives on milk, being still an infant, is not acquainted with the teaching about righteousness. 14 But solid food is for √the mature, who by constant use have trained themselves to distinguish good from evil.

Falling Away
5:11-6:20

1. Begins by being slow to learn (5:11- 14)
– Hard to explain things about the priesthood because slow to learn (11)
– Have had time to become teachers (12)
– Need to be taught the elementary truths of God’s word (12)
– After having time to become teachers (maybe 30 years), were still nursing babies spiritually—not mature (13).
– Had not trained themselves by constant use of the word (14)
– Had not trained themselves to distinguish good from evil (14)
2. Prevent by leaving the elementary teachings (6:1-3).
– Elementary teachings are just the foundation (1).
– Don’t lay again the foundation of repentance from acts that lead to death (1).
– Don’t lay again the foundation of faith in God (1).
– Don’t lay again the foundation of instruction about baptisms [baptismwn] (2; cf.9:10; Mk. 7:4).
– Don’t lay again the foundation of instruction about the laying on of hands (2; cf. Acts 6:6; 8:17; 19:5-6).
– Don’t lay again the foundation of instruction about the resurrection of the dead (2).
– Don’t lay again the foundation of instruction about eternal judgment (2).

3. It is impossible to bring back to repentance some that fall away (6:4-6).
– Those who have once been enlightened (4).
– Those who have tasted the heavenly gift (4)
-Those who have shared in the holy Spirit (4)
-Those who have tasted the goodness of the word of God (5)
-Those who have tasted the powers of the coming age (5)
– They are crucifying the Son of God all over again (6)
– Because they are subjecting the Son of God to public disgrace (6)
Note: If the gospel fails, God has no other plan!

4. The danger the Hebrews face is illustrated (6:7-8)
– Land that drinks in the rain and produces a useful crop receives the blessing of God (7).
– Land that produces thorns and thistles is worthless and is in danger of being cursed (8).
– In the end the land that produces thorns and thistles will be burned (8).

5. Reasons why the writer was confident of better things from them–things that accompany salvation (6:9-12)
– God is not unjust (10).
– God will not forget their work and love shown toward him by helping his people (10).
– Each showing this help until the very end (11).
– Faithful service to God makes your hope sure (11).
– Do not become lazy (12).
– Imitate the faithful and patient who inherit the promise of God (12)

6. God’s oath should make our faith (confidence) firm (6:13-15)
– He promised a blessing to Abraham (13).
– God backed his promise with an oath (13-14
– Abraham waited patiently and received the promise (15).

7. God’s oath and Christ’s priesthood should encourage us (6:16-20).
– Swearing by someone greater than self confirmed a promise and removed all questions 16).
– God made his unchanging purpose sure with an oath (17).
– God swore so that two unchangeable things would greatly encourage us (18).
– This hope is a firm and sure anchor for our souls (19).
– This hope is rooted in the sanctuary where Christ has gone to atone for our sins (19-20).
– Christ is our high priest forever, just like Melchizedek (20).

Why the Hebrews are not Ready for Deeper Study

1. Slow to learn (11).
– Priesthood hard to explain
– Much more needed explained
– Had not exercised the use of knowledge to know good from evil (14)
– Too immature to understand (14)
2. Need taught the elementary truths (12).
– Ought to be teachers
– Need elementary truths AGAIN
3. Need milk, not solid food (12).
– Live on milk
– Still an infant
4. Not acquainted with teachings about righteousness (13).
5. Solid food is for the mature (14)
– Trained themselves by constant use of
the word.
– Could distinguish good from evil.

Heb. 6:1 Therefore √let us leave the elementary teachings about Christ and √go on to maturity, not laying again the √foundation of repentance from acts that lead to death, and of faith in God, 2 instruction about baptisms, the laying on of hands, the resurrection of the dead, and eternal judgment. 3 And God permitting, we will do so.

Maturity

1. Not slow to learn
2. Have gone beyond the elementary truths
3. Ready to be teachers
4. Can take solid food
5. Grown up, not infant
6. Acquainted with teachings about righteousness
7. Trained themselves by constant use of the word
8. Can distinguish good from evil

Heb. 6:4 √It is impossible for those who have √√once been enlightened, who √have tasted the heavenly gift, √who have shared in the Holy Spirit, 5 √who have tasted the goodness of the word of God and the powers of the coming age, 6 √IF THEY FALL AWAY, √to be brought back to repentance, because to their loss they are √crucifying the Son of God all over again and subjecting him to public disgrace.

Heb. 6:7 Land that drinks in the rain often falling on it and that produces a crop useful to those for whom it is farmed receives the blessing of God. 8 But land that produces thorns and thistles is worthless and is in danger of being cursed. In the end it will be burned.

Heb. 6:9 Even though we speak like this, dear friends, we are confident of better things in your case — things that accompany salvation. 10 √God is not unjust; he will not forget your work and the love you have shown him as you have helped his people and continue to help them. 11 We want each of you to show this same diligence √to the very end, in order to make your hope sure. 12 √We do not want you to become lazy, but to imitate those who through faith and patience inherit what has been promised.

Heb. 6:13 When God made his promise to Abraham, since there was no one greater for him to swear by, √he swore by himself, 14 saying, “I will surely bless you and give you many descendants.” 15 And so after waiting patiently, Abraham received what was promised.

Heb. 6:16 √Men swear by someone greater than themselves, and the oath confirms what is said and puts an end to all argument. 17 Because God wanted to make the unchanging nature of his purpose very clear to the heirs of what was promised, he confirmed it with an oath. 18 God did this so that, by √two unchangeable things in which it is impossible for God to lie, we who have fled to take hold of the hope offered to us may be greatly encouraged. 19 We have this √hope as an anchor for the soul, firm and secure. It enters the inner sanctuary behind the curtain, 20 where Jesus, who went before us, has entered on our behalf. √He has become a high priest forever, in the order of Melchizedek.


Heb. 7:1 This MELCHIZEDEK was √king of Salem and √priest of God Most High. He met Abraham returning from the defeat of the kings and √blessed him, 2 and √Abraham gave him a tenth of everything. First, √his name means “king of righteousness”; then also, √“king of Salem” means “king of peace.” 3 √Without father or mother, √without genealogy, √without beginning of days or √end of life, like the Son of God √he remains a priest forever.

Melchizedek
1. King of Salem
2. Priest of God Most High
3. When he met Abraham at the defeat of the kings, Abraham paid him a tenth of the spoils.
4. Name means king of righteousness.
5. King of Salem means king of peace.
6. He is without father or mother.
7. He is without genealogy.
8. He is without beginning.
9. He is without end of life.
10. He remains a priest forever.

Heb. 7:4 √Just think how great he was: √Even the patriarch Abraham gave him a tenth of the plunder! 5 Now the law requires the descendants of Levi who become priests to collect a tenth from the people — that is, their brothers — even though their brothers are descended from Abraham. 6 This man, however, did not trace his descent from Levi, yet √he collected a tenth from Abraham and √blessed him who had the promises. 7 And without doubt the √lesser person is blessed by the greater. 8 In the one case, the tenth is collected by men who die; but in the other case, by √him who is declared to be living. 9 One might even say that √Levi, who collects the tenth, paid the tenth through Abraham, 10 because when Melchizedek met Abraham, Levi was still in the body of his ancestor.

How Great Melchizedek Was

1. Even Abraham, the patriarch, gave him a tenth.
2. By requirement of the law, the Levites collected a tenth from their brothers, descendants of Abraham.

Notes:
1. As a priest, Christ has the following qualities:
a. Holy
b. Blalmeless
c. Undefiled
d. Separatred from sinners (does not take part in their sins)
e. Exalted above the heavens.
2. Unlike other priests, Jesus did not need to offer a sacrifice for his own sins–he had no sin (4:15).
3. He only had to offer his sacrifice once–not daily.
4. One sacrifice was adequate for all and forever.
5. Christ offered himself–a completely adequate (once-for- all) sacrifice.
6. Priests under the law were subject to weaknesses, but Christ has been made perfect forever.

Christ is a priest that is superior to Levitical priests.

1. Provides perfection for men: Levites did not (7:11-14).
2. Priest by indestructible life: Levites by physical descent (7:15-17).
3. Grants access to God: Levites did not (7:18-20).
4. Assumed office by an oath of God: Levites w/o an oath (7:20-22).
5. One priest because of endless life: Levites were many because of death (7:23-25).
6. Sinless: Levites were sinners (7:26-27).
7. Offered only one sacrifice: Levites offered many (7:27).
8. Perfect: Levites had weaknesses (7

Questions:
1. What does it mean to be holy?
2. Explain the holiness of Jesus.
3. To what degree is Jesus blameless?
4. What is the meaning of “undefiled”?
5. How is Jesus separated from sinners?
7. What does it mean for Jesus to be exalted above theheavens?
8. In what two ways is Jesus unlike other priests?
9. What is the scope of the sacrifice of Jesus?
10. How many sacrifices was it necessary for Jesus to make?
11. What did other priests have that Jesus did not have?

Heb. 7:11 If perfection could have been attained through the Levitical priesthood (for on the basis of it the law was given to the people), why was there still need for another priest to come — one in the order of Melchizedek, not in the order of Aaron? 12 For when there is a change of the priesthood, there must also be a change of the law. 13 He of whom these things are said belonged to a different tribe, and no one from that tribe has ever served at the altar. 14 For it is clear that our Lord descended from Judah, and in regard to that tribe Moses said nothing about priests. 15 And what we have said is even more clear if another priest like Melchizedek appears, 16 one who has become a priest not on the basis of a regulation as to his ancestry but on the basis of the power of an indestructible life. 17 For it is declared: “You are a priest forever, in the order of Melchizedek.”



Perfection in Hebrews

Heb. 2:10 In bringing many sons to glory, it was fitting that God, for whom and through whom everything exists, should make the author of their salvation perfect through suffering.

Heb. 5:9 and, once made perfect, he became the source of eternal salvation for all who obey him

Heb. 7:19 (for the law made nothing perfect), and a better hope is introduced, by which we draw near to God.

Heb. 7:28 For the law appoints as high priests men who are weak; but the oath, which came after the law, appointed the Son, who has been made perfect forever.

Heb. 9:9 This is an illustration for the present time, indicating that the gifts and sacrifices being offered were not able to clear the conscience of the worshiper.

Heb. 9:11 When Christ came as high priest of the good things that are already here, he went through the greater and more perfect tabernacle that is not man-made, that is to say, not a part of this creation.

Heb. 10:1 The law is only a shadow of the good things that are coming — not the realities themselves. For this reason it can never, by the same sacrifices repeated endlessly year after year, make perfect those who draw near to worship.

Heb. 10:14 because by one sacrifice he has made perfect forever those who are being made holy.

Heb. 11:40 God had planned something better for us so that only together with us would they be made perfect.

Heb. 12:23 to the church of the firstborn, whose names are written in heaven. You have come to God, the judge of all men, to the spirits of righteous men made perfect,

Jesus Excluded from Levitical Priesthood by the “Law of Exclusion”

1. The law specified that the priests must come from the descendants of Levi.
2. The law said nothing about priests coming from the tribe of Judah.
3. This specific language excluded anyone from the Tribe of Judah or any other than the tribe of Levi.
4. Therefore, under the law, Jesus could not have been a priest.
5. On the basis of Jesus and his atoning death, God changed the law and made a way for Jesus to become our high priest.
6. This shows that specific language is exclusive language, when the Scripture says what/who/when/where/how and says nothing about anything but that which is specified.


Heb. 7:18 The former regulation is set aside because it was weak and useless 19 (for the law made nothing perfect), and a better hope is introduced, by which we draw near to God.

Heb. 7:20 And it was not without an oath! Others became priests without any oath, 21 but he became a priest with an oath when God said to him: “The Lord has sworn and will not change his mind: ‘You are a priest forever.’” 22 Because of this oath, Jesus has become the guarantee of a better covenant.

Heb. 7:23 Now there have been many of those priests, since death prevented them from continuing in office; 24 but because Jesus lives forever, he has a permanent priesthood. 25 Therefore he is able to save completely those who come to God through him, because he always lives to intercede for them.

Heb. 7:26 Such a high priest meets our need — one who is holy, blameless, pure, set apart from sinners, exalted above the heavens. 27 Unlike the other high priests, he does not need to offer sacrifices day after day, first for his own sins, and then for the sins of the people. He sacrificed for their sins once for all when he offered himself. 28 For the law appoints as high priests men who are weak; but the oath, which came after the law, appointed the Son, who has been made perfect forever.

Christ is a priest that is superior to Levitical priests.

1. Provides perfection for men: Levites did not (7:11-14).
2. Priest by indestructible life: Levites by physical descent (7:15-17).
3. Grants access to God: Levites did not (7:18-20).
4. Assumed office by an oath of God: Levites w/o an oath (7:20-22).
5. One priest because of endless life: Levites were many because of death (7:23-25).
6. Sinless: Levites were sinners (7:26-27).
7. Offered only one sacrifice: Levites offered many (7:27).
8. Perfect: Levites had weaknesses (7


Heb. 8:1 THE POINT of what we are saying is this: WE DO HAVE SUCH A HIGH PRIEST, who sat down at the right hand of the throne of the Majesty in heaven, 2 and who serves in the sanctuary, the true tabernacle set up by the Lord, not by man.

Heb. 8:3 Every high priest is appointed to offer both gifts and sacrifices, and so it was necessary for this one also to have something to offer. 4 If he were on earth, he would not be a priest, for there are already men who offer the gifts prescribed by the law. 5 They serve at a sanctuary that is a copy and shadow of what is in heaven. This is why Moses was warned when he was about to build the tabernacle: “See to it that you make everything according to the pattern shown you on the mountain.” 6 But THE MINISTRY JESUS HAS RECEIVED IS AS SUPERIOR to theirs as THE COVENANT OF WHICH HE IS MEDIATOR IS SUPERIOR to the old one, and it is founded on better promises.

Heb. 8:7 For if there had been nothing wrong with that first covenant, no place would have been sought for another. 8 But God found fault with the people and said: “The time is coming, declares the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah. 9 It will not be like the covenant I made with their forefathers when I took them by the hand to lead them out of Egypt, because they did not remain faithful to my covenant, and I turned away from them, declares the Lord. 10 This is the covenant I will make with the house of Israel after that time, declares the Lord. I will put my laws in their minds and write them on their hearts. I WILL BE THEIR GOD, AND THEY WILL BE MY PEOPLE. 11 No longer will a man teach his neighbor, or a man his brother, saying, ‘Know the Lord,’ because they will all know me, from the least of them to the greatest. 12 For I will forgive their wickedness and will remember their sins no more.”

Heb. 8:13 By calling this covenant “new,” he has made the first one obsolete; and what is obsolete and aging will soon disappear.

THE OLD vs THE NEW

THE FURNITURE OF THE TABERNACLE (VV. 1-5)
Heb. 9:1 ¶ Now the first covenant had REGULATIONS for worship and also an earthly sanctuary. 2 A TABERNACLE was set up. In its first room were the √lampstand, √the table and the consecrated bread; this was called THE HOLY PLACE. 3 Behind the second curtain was a room called THE MOST HOLY PLACE, 4 which had the √golden altar of incense and √the gold-covered ark of the covenant. This ark contained √the gold jar of manna, √Aaron’s staff that had budded, and √the stone tablets of the covenant. 5 Above the ark were the √cherubim of the Glory, overshadowing the atonement cover. But we cannot discuss these things in detail now.

1. The Golden Candlestick
– Made of one talent of gold (Ex. 25:31-40)
– Five to six feet tall and burned on pure olive oil continually (Ex. 27:20-21; Lev. 24:1-4).
– A type of the church dispensing the light of the gospel perpetually (Zech. 4:1-14; Rev. 1:20; 1 Tim. 3:15).
– The candlestick was only the support; the olive oil was the source of the light. In the Bible, oil is representative of the Holy Spirit, the source of the light of God’s word (cf. Isa. 61:1; Acts 10:38; Heb. 1:9; 1 Jn. 2:20, 27)
– Seven lamps, thus, seem to represent the perfect light of the gospel.
2. The Table of Shewbread (Ex. 25:23-30; Lev. 24:5-9)
– Eaten by the priests, and symbolic of the spiritual food for God’s priests–all Christians (1 Pet. 2:5, 9; Rev. 5:6; 5;10).
– Frankincense symbolized the prayers and thanksgiving (Rev. 5:8).
3. The Altar of Incense (Ex. 30:1-10, 34-38)
– Symbolized the prayers of the saints (cf. Psa. 41:2; Lk. 1:9-10; Rev. 5:8; 8:3-4).
– Placed just before the mercy seat, symbolizing God’s throne (Jer. 3:15-17; Hev. 4:16).
4. The Golden Censer, for offering sacrifices for sins. Note: From what follows it seems that this referred to the Golden Censor (where the High Priest offered a sacrifice once a year) rather than the Golden Altar (on which they offered incense severy morning and evening). It might represent both.
5. The Ark of the Covenant
– Cherubim, representing the angels who minister to God’s people (Heb. 1:14).
– The contents (the jar of manna, Aaron’s rod that budded, and the table of the covenant) representing God’s providence and his guidance.

THE MEANING OF THE RITUAL (VV. 6-10)

Heb. 9:6 ¶ When everything had been arranged like this, the priests entered regularly into the outer room to carry on their ministry. 7 But only the high priest entered the inner room, and that only once a year, and never without blood, which he offered for himself and for the sins the people had committed in ignorance. 8 THE HOLY SPIRIT WAS SHOWING BY THIS (3:7; 2 Pet. 1:21)THAT THE WAY INTO THE MOST HOLY PLACE HAD NOT YET BEEN DISCLOSED AS LONG AS THE FIRST TABERNACLE WAS STILL STANDING. 9 This is an illustration for the present time, indicating that the gifts and sacrifices being offered were not able to clear the conscience of the worshiper. 10 They are only a matter of food and drink and various ceremonial washings — external regulations applying until the time of the new order.

1. Common priests served in the “outer room,” i.e., the holy place.
2. High priests served in the “inner room,” i.e., the most holy place.
3. The high priest offered blood for themselves and for the people.
4. They offered blood for sins “committed in ignorance,” not for sins of rebellion against God. Thus, the people had to be faithful to have this forgiveness.
5. The message conveyed was from the “Holy Spirit.” For no prophecy ever came by the will of man: but men spake from God, being moved by the Holy Spirit (2Pet. 1:21).
6. As long as the tabernacle was standing, the message was that the true offering for sin had not yet been offered.
7. The offerings of the old system could not clear the conscience of the worshipers.
9. Those sacrifices were external and temporary–anticipating the new order.

THE APPLICATION TO CHRISTIANS (VV. 11-14)

Heb. 9:11 ¶ When CHRIST CAME AS HIGH PRIEST OF THE GOOD THINGS THAT ARE ALREADY HERE, he went through the greater and more perfect tabernacle that is not man-made, that is to say, not a part of this creation. 12 He did not enter by means of the blood of goats and calves; BUT HE ENTERED THE MOST HOLY PLACE ONCE FOR ALL BY HIS OWN BLOOD, HAVING OBTAINED ETERNAL REDEMPTION. 13 The blood of goats and bulls and the ashes of a heifer sprinkled on those who are ceremonially unclean sanctify them so that they are outwardly clean. 14 How much more, then, will the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered himself unblemished to God, cleanse our consciences from acts that lead to death, so that we may serve the living God!

1. Christ as our high priest entered into the true tabernacle.
2. He entered once for all.
3. He entered by His own blood.
4. He obtained eternal redemption.
5. The sacrifices of goats and cattle made them outwardly ceremonially clean.
6. The blood of Christ cleanses our consciences, the inward man.
7. This enables us to serve the living God.



JESUS’ LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT
(VV. 15-28)

Heb. 9:15 ¶ For this REASON CHRIST IS THE MEDIATOR OF A NEW COVENANT, that those who are called may receive the promised eternal inheritance — NOW THAT HE HAS DIED AS A RANSOM TO SET THEM FREE FROM THE SINS COMMITTED UNDER THE FIRST COVENANT.

Heb. 9:16 ¶ In the case of a will, it is necessary to prove the death of the one who made it, 17 because a will is in force only when somebody has died; it never takes effect while the one who made it is living. 18 This is why even the first covenant was not put into effect without blood. 19 When Moses had proclaimed every commandment of the law to all the people, he took the blood of calves, together with water, scarlet wool and branches of hyssop, and sprinkled the scroll and all the people. 20 He said, “This is the blood of the covenant, which God has commanded you to keep.” 21 In the same way, he sprinkled with the blood both the tabernacle and everything used in its ceremonies. 22 In fact, the law requires that nearly everything be cleansed with blood, and without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness.

1. Christ is the mediator of a new covenant that makes the promise of an eternal inheritance possible.
2. Christ’s death sets men free from sins committed under the first covenant.
3. The new covenant, the last will and testament of Christ, went into effect only after He died.
4. Even the old covenant was established by blood.
5. The law requires that things be cleansed by blood.
6. Without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness, i.e., without the shedding of the blood of Christ there could be no forgiveness or cleansing of the conscience, the inner man.

CHRIST OFFERED HIMSELF IN HEAVEN ONCE FOR THE SINS OF THE PEOPLE

Heb. 9:23 ¶ It was necessary, then, for the copies of the heavenly things to be purified with these sacrifices, but the heavenly things themselves with better sacrifices than these. 24 For Christ did not enter a man-made sanctuary that was only a copy of the true one; he entered heaven itself, now to appear for us in God’s presence. 25 Nor did he enter heaven to offer himself again and again, the way the high priest enters the Most Holy Place every year with blood that is not his own. 26 Then Christ would have had to suffer many times since the creation of the world. But now he has appeared once for all at the end of the ages to do away with sin by the sacrifice of himself. 27 Just as man is destined to die once, and after that to face judgment, 28 so Christ was sacrificed once to take away the sins of many people; and he will appear a second time, not to bear sin, but to bring salvation to those who are waiting for him.

1. Christ entered heaven with a better sacrifice.
2. He offered Himself in the presence of God.
3. His blood was adequate as a once-for-all sacrifice.
4. Christ’s sacrifice does away with sin.
5. Man must die once, so Christ had to die only once.
6. Christ will appear a second time, not to sacrifice for sin, but to bring salvation to those who are waiting for Him, people of faith.

A Final Word on the Better Way
Hebrews 10

I. The Shadow and the Reality

A. Animal sacrifices failed to take away sins (1-4).
[1.The law was about a shadow of good things to come.] Heb. 10:1 For the law having a shadow (Cf. Col. 2:17) of the good things to come, not the very image (Col. 2:15; 2 Cor. 3:18; 4:4) of the things, [2. The law could never make perfect those who came to God.] can never with the same sacrifices year by year, which they offer continually, make perfect them that draw nigh. [3. If the law had made people perfect, the priests would not have continued to offer sacrifices, because the people would not have had any sin.] 2 Else would they not have ceased to be offered? because the worshippers, having been once cleansed, would have had no more consciousness of sins. [4. The repeating of sacrifices showed them that they had not been forgiven.] 3 But in those sacrifices there is a remembrance made of sins year by year. [5. The blood of bulls and goats could not take away sins.]
4 For it is impossible that the blood of bulls and goats should take away sins.

B. Christ provided the perfect sacrifice that takes away sins (5-10).
[1. Therefore, God prepared Christ a body to offer for our sins.] 5 Wherefore when he cometh into the world, he saith, Sacrifice and offering thou wouldest not, But a body didst thou prepare for me; 6 In whole burnt offerings and sacrifices for sin thou hadst no pleasure: [2. Christ came to do God’s will and offer his body for our sins.] 7 Then said I, Lo, I am come In the roll of the book it is written of me To do thy will, O God. 8 Saying above, Sacrifices and offerings and whole burnt offerings and sacrifices for sin thou wouldest not, neither hadst pleasure therein the which are offered according to the law, [3. God took away the first system, the shadow, so that he could establish the second system.] 9 then hath he said, Lo, I am come to do thy will. He taketh away the first, that he may establish the second. [4. We are sanctified by the offering of Christ, once for all.] 10 By which will we have been sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all.

C. Christ is now exalted to rule over God’s people (11-18).

[1. The sacrifice of Christ opened the way for Christ to reign in the kingdom.] 11 And every priest indeed standeth day by day ministering and offering oftentimes the same sacrifices, the which can never take away sins: 12 but he, when he had offered one sacrifice for sins for ever, sat down on the right hand of God; 13 henceforth expecting till his enemies be made the footstool of his feet. 14 For by one offering he hath perfected for ever them that are sanctified. [2. This is the plan the Holy Spirit spoke of through Jeremiah.] 15 And the Holy Spirit also beareth witness to us; for after he hath said, 16 This is the covenant that I will make with them After those days, saith the Lord: I will put my laws on their heart, And upon their mind also will I write them; then saith he, [3. Through the offering of Christ, God forgives our sins, so we need no more sacrifices.] 17 And their sins and their iniquities will I remember no more. 18 Now where remission of these is, there is no more offering for sin.

II. Exhortation not to Turn Away from Christ

A. Christians should now draw near to God through Christ.
[1. We can now have boldness to draw near to God ourselves, not through priests and their sacrifices, but through the new and living way.] 19 Having therefore, brethren, boldness to enter into the holy place by the blood of Jesus, 20 by the way which he dedicated for us, a new and living way, through the veil, that is to say, his flesh; [2. We do not fear to draw near because we have our consciences cleaned.] 21 and having a great priest over the house of God; 22 let us draw near with a true heart in fullness of faith, having our hearts sprinkled from an evil conscience: and having our body washed with pure water, [3. Now we can maintain our hope because God is faithful.] 23 let us hold fast the confession of our hope that it waver not; for he is faithful that promised: [4. Now we must provoke one another to love and good works.] 24 and let us consider one another to provoke unto love and good works; [5. We must not neglect assembling, but come together and exhort one another to prepare for the coming of the Lord.] 25 not forsaking our own assembling together, as the custom of some is, but exhorting one another; and so much the more, as ye see the day drawing nigh.

B. Christians are warned against turning away from Christ.
[1. If we willfully make a practice of sinning, we loose the benefits of Christ’s sacrifice and are in danger of judgment.] 26 For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more a sacrifice for sins, 27 but a certain fearful expectation of judgment, and a fierceness of fire which shall devour the adversaries. [2. Just as those who rejected Moses’ law were punished, so we who reject Christ will have a greater punishment.] 28 A man that hath set at nought Moses law dieth without compassion on the word of two or three witnesses: 29 of how much sorer punishment, think ye, shall he be judged worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant wherewith he was sanctified an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace? 30 For we know him that said, Vengeance belongeth unto me, I will recompense. And again, The Lord shall judge his people. 31 It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God. [3. Christians should remember the price we have paid to follow Jesus and not squander what we sought at such cost to Christ and to us.] 32 But call to remembrance the former days, in which, after ye were enlightened, ye endured a great conflict of sufferings; 33 partly, being made a gazingstock both by reproaches and afflictions; and partly, becoming partakers with them that were so used. 34 For ye both had compassion on them that were in bonds, and took joyfully the spoiling of your possessions, knowing that ye have for yourselves a better possession and an abiding one. 35 Cast not away therefore your boldness, which hath great recompense of reward. 36 For ye have need of patience, that, having done the will of God, ye may receive the promise. [4. Christ is coming again, but we can face his coming with faith and look forward to the saving of our souls.] 37 For yet a very little while, He that cometh shall come, and shall not tarry. 38 But my righteous one shall live by faith: And if he shrink back, my soul hath no pleasure in him. 39 But we are not of them that shrink back unto perdition; but of them that have faith unto the saving of the soul.




Faith that Pleases God
Hebrews 11

• Is being sure and certain.
Heb. 11:1 Now faith is being sure of what we hope for and certain of what we do not see. 2 This is what the ancients were commended for.

• Is exercised with understanding (3)
Heb. 11:3 By faith we understand that the universe was formed at God’s command, so that what is seen was not made out of what was visible.

• Does what God prefers, not what we prefer (4)
Heb. 11:4 By faith Abel offered God a better sacrifice than Cain did. By faith he was commended as a righteous man, when God spoke well of his offerings. And by faith he still speaks, even though he is dead.

• Acts to please God (5)
Heb. 11:5 By faith Enoch was taken from this life, so that he did not experience death; he could not be found, because God had taken him away. For before he was taken, he was commended as one who pleased God.

• Is necessary (6)
6 And without faith it is impossible to please God, because anyone who comes to him must believe that he exists and that he rewards those who earnestly seek him.

• Is being obedient (7)
Heb. 11:7 By faith Noah, when warned about things not yet seen, in holy fear built an ark to save his family. By his faith he condemned the world and became heir of the righteousness that comes by faith.

• Causes us to put ourselves completely in the care and guidance of God (8-10)
Heb. 11:8 By faith Abraham, when called to go to a place he would later receive as his inheritance, obeyed and went, even though he did not know where he was going. 9 By faith he made his home in the promised land like a stranger in a foreign country; he lived in tents, as did Isaac and Jacob, who were heirs with him of the same promise. 10 For he was looking forward to the city with foundations, whose architect and builder is God.

• Trusts God even when His word contradicts nature (11-12)
Heb. 11:11 By faith Abraham, even though he was past age — and Sarah herself was barren — was enabled to become a father because he considered him faithful who had made the promise. 12 And so from this one man, and he as good as dead, came descendants as numerous as the stars in the sky and as countless as the sand on the seashore.

• Is confident in the unseen (13-16)
Heb. 11:13 All these people were still living by faith when they died. They did not receive the things promised; they only saw them and welcomed them from a distance. And they admitted that they were aliens and strangers on earth. 14 People who say such things show that they are looking for a country of their own. 15 If they had been thinking of the country they had left, they would have had opportunity to return. 16 Instead, they were longing for a better country — a heavenly one. Therefore God is not ashamed to be called their God, for he has prepared a city for them.

• Will sacrifice what we love the most, and Trusts God even when it appears that there is a contradiction (17-19).
Heb. 11:17 By faith Abraham, when God tested him, offered Isaac as a sacrifice. He who had received the promises was about to sacrifice his one and only son, 18 even though God had said to him, “It is through Isaac that your offspring will be reckoned.” 19 Abraham reasoned that God could raise the dead, and figuratively speaking, he did receive Isaac back from death.

• Trusts the future (20-22)
Heb. 11:20 By faith Isaac blessed Jacob and Esau in regard to their future.

Heb. 11:21 By faith Jacob, when he was dying, blessed each of Joseph’s sons, and worshiped as he leaned on the top of his staff.

Heb. 11:22 By faith Joseph, when his end was near, spoke about the exodus of the Israelites from Egypt and gave instructions about his bones.

• Overcomes fear (23)
Heb. 11:23 By faith Moses’ parents hid him for three months after he was born, because they saw he was no ordinary child, and they were not afraid of the king’s edict.

• Puts obedience to God above wealth and even personal comfort (24-28)
Heb. 11:24 By faith Moses, when he had grown up, refused to be known as the son of Pharaoh’s daughter. 25 He chose to be mistreated along with the people of God rather than to enjoy the pleasures of sin for a short time. 26 He regarded disgrace for the sake of Christ as of greater value than the treasures of Egypt, because he was looking ahead to his reward. 27 By faith he left Egypt, not fearing the king’s anger; he persevered because he saw him who is invisible. 28 By faith he kept the Passover and the sprinkling of blood, so that the destroyer of the firstborn would not touch the firstborn of Israel.

• Accepts and acts on that which seems ridiculous from a human standpoint (29-30)
Heb. 11:29 By faith the people passed through the Red Sea as on dry land; but when the Egyptians tried to do so, they were drowned.

Heb. 11:30 By faith the walls of Jericho fell, after the people had marched around them for seven days.

• Changes very sinful people into servants of God (31)
Heb. 11:31 By faith the prostitute Rahab, because she welcomed the spies, was not killed with those who were disobedient.

• Trusts God for victory after extreme suffering and sacrifice (32-38)
Heb. 11:32 And what more shall I say? I do not have time to tell about Gideon, Barak, Samson, Jephthah, David, Samuel and the prophets, 33 who through faith conquered kingdoms, administered justice, and gained what was promised; who shut the mouths of lions, 34 quenched the fury of the flames, and escaped the edge of the sword; whose weakness was turned to strength; and who became powerful in battle and routed foreign armies. 35 Women received back their dead, raised to life again. Others were tortured and refused to be released, so that they might gain a better resurrection. 36 Some faced jeers and flogging, while still others were chained and put in prison. 37 They were stoned; they were sawed in two; they were put to death by the sword. They went about in sheepskins and goatskins, destitute, persecuted and mistreated — 38 the world was not worthy of them. They wandered in deserts and mountains, and in caves and holes in the ground.

• Is patient enough to think not only of today, but of that which is eternal (39-40)
Heb. 11:39 These were all commended for their faith, yet none of them received what had been promised. 40 God had planned something better for us so that only together with us would they be made perfect.

Faith and the Believer’s Total Being

Heb. 12:1 Therefore, since we are surrounded by such a great cloud of witnesses, let us throw off everything that hinders and the sin that so easily entangles, and let us run with perseverance the race marked out for us. 2 Let us fix our eyes on Jesus, the author and perfecter of our faith, who for the joy set before him endured the cross, scorning its shame, and sat down at the right hand of the throne of God. 3 Consider him who endured such opposition from sinful men, so that you will not grow weary and lose heart.

1. Run the race of the Christian life with perseverance (1-3).
– Throw off hindrances.
– Run with perseverance the race as it is marked off.
– Fix our eyes on Jesus.
– The Pioneer of our faith
– The Perfecter of our faith
– Endured the cross with joy
– Scorned the shame of the cross
– At the right hand of God
– Endured opposition from sinful men
– Do not grow weary and lose heart.

Heb. 12:4 In your struggle against sin, you have not yet resisted to the point of shedding your blood. 5 And you have forgotten that word of encouragement that addresses you as sons: “My son, do not make light of the Lord’s discipline, and do not lose heart when he rebukes you, 6 because the Lord disciplines those he loves, and he punishes everyone he accepts as a son.”

Heb. 12:7 Endure hardship as discipline; God is treating you as sons. For what son is not disciplined by his father? 8 If you are not disciplined (and everyone undergoes discipline), then you are illegitimate children and not true sons. 9 Moreover, we have all had human fathers who disciplined us and we respected them for it. How much more should we submit to the Father of our spirits and live! 10 Our fathers disciplined us for a little while as they thought best; but God disciplines us for our good, that we may share in his holiness. 11 No discipline seems pleasant at the time, but painful. Later on, however, it produces a harvest of righteousness and peace for those who have been trained by it.

Heb. 12:12 Therefore, strengthen your feeble arms and weak knees. 13 “Make level paths for your feet,” so that the lame may not be disabled, but rather healed.

2. Look at hardship through eyes of faith (4-11).
– Have not shed blood.
– It is discipline.
– It is a sign of love.
– It provides training.
– Shows we are God’s children.
– God disciplines us for our good.
– Does not seem good, but produces righteousness and peace.

3. Take charge of your destiny (12-13).

Heb. 12:14 Make every effort to live in peace with all men and to be holy; without holiness no one will see the Lord. 15 See to it that no one misses the grace of God and that no bitter root grows up to cause trouble and defile many. 16 See that no one is sexually immoral, or is godless like Esau, who for a single meal sold his inheritance rights as the oldest son. 17 Afterward, as you know, when he wanted to inherit this blessing, he was rejected. He could bring about no change of mind, though he sought the blessing with tears.

Exhortations to Right Living (14-17)

1. Live in peace with all (14).
2. Be holy (14).
3. Spread the grace of God (15).
4. Avoid bitterness that discourages (15).
5. Avoid and discourage sexual immorality (16).
6. Do not be godless or treat holy things lightly (16).
7. Be careful not to go too far to repent (17; cf. 6:4-6; 10:26-31).


Heb. 12:18 You have not come to a mountain that can be touched and that is burning with fire; to darkness, gloom and storm; 19 to a trumpet blast or to such a voice speaking words that those who heard it begged that no further word be spoken to them, 20 because they could not bear what was commanded: “If even an animal touches the mountain, it must be stoned.” 21 The sight was so terrifying that Moses said, “I am trembling with fear.”

Heb. 12:22 But you have come to Mount Zion, to the heavenly Jerusalem, the city of the living God. You have come to thousands upon thousands of angels in joyful assembly, 23 to the church of the firstborn, whose names are written in heaven. You have come to God, the judge of all men, to the spirits of righteous men made perfect, 24 to Jesus the mediator of a new covenant, and to the sprinkled blood that speaks a better word than the blood of Abel.

Heb. 12:25 See to it that you do not refuse him who speaks. If they did not escape when they refused him who warned them on earth, how much less will we, if we turn away from him who warns us from heaven? 26 At that time his voice shook the earth, but now he has promised, “Once more I will shake not only the earth but also the heavens.” 27 The words “once more” indicate the removing of what can be shaken — that is, created things — so that what cannot be shaken may remain.

Heb. 12:28 Therefore, since we are receiving a kingdom that cannot be shaken, let us be thankful, and so worship God acceptably with reverence and awe, 29 for our “God is a consuming fire.”

Warnings Against Rejecting Christ
(18-29)
1. We have come to Christ, not Moses–to the Church, not Sinai (18-24).
– Not to condemnation for not keeping laws we cannot keep.
– Not to fear, but to faith and joy.
– The New Covenant of Life, not the Old Covenant of Death.

2. See to it that you do not refuse Jesus (25-29).
– Those who refuse Him will be destroyed.
– The kingdom of Christ cannot be shaken.
– We should worship acceptably with reverence and awe.
– There is a consuming fire for those who reject Christ.


Hebrews 13
Practical Expressions of Faith
1. Continue brotherly love (1).
Heb. 13:1 Keep on loving each other as brothers.

2. Practice hospitality [be a lover of strangers (2).
2 Do not forget to entertain strangers, for by so doing some people have entertained angels without knowing it.

3. Empathetically remember those in prison and those being mistreated (3).
3 Remember those in prison as if you were their fellow prisoners, and those who are mistreated as if you yourselves were suffering.

4. Honor marriage and keep the marriage bed pure (4).
Heb. 13:4 Marriage should be honored by all, and the marriage bed kept pure, for God will judge the adulterer and all the sexually immoral.

5. Keep free from the love of money and trust God to take care of you (5-6).
5 Keep your lives free from the love of money and be content with what you have, because God has said, “Never will I leave you; never will I forsake you.” 6 So we say with confidence, “The Lord is my helper; I will not be afraid. What can man do to me?”

6. Imitate the lives of your spiritual leaders, because the Lord will reward your faith as He did theirs (7-8).
Heb. 13:7 Remember your leaders, who spoke the word of God to you. Consider the outcome of their way of life and imitate their faith. 8 Jesus Christ is the same yesterday and today and forever.

7. Do not be carried away by strange teachings that focus on ceremonial foods rather than on the grace of God (9-10).
Heb. 13:9 Do not be carried away by all kinds of strange teachings. It is good for our hearts to be strengthened by grace, not by ceremonial foods, which are of no value to those who eat them. 10 We have an altar from which those who minister at the tabernacle have no right to eat.

8. Follow the example of Jesus and be willing to endure disgrace—Don’t give up (11-14).
Heb. 13:11 The high priest carries the blood of animals into the Most Holy Place as a sin offering, but the bodies are burned outside the camp. 12 And so Jesus also suffered outside the city gate to make the people holy through his own blood. 13 Let us, then, go to him outside the camp, bearing the disgrace he bore. 14 For here we do not have an enduring city, but we are looking for the city that is to come.

9. Continue to serve God through Christ (15).
Heb. 13:15 Through Jesus, therefore, let us continually offer to God a sacrifice of praise — the fruit of lips that confess his name.

10. Do good and share with others sacrificially (16).
16 And do not forget to do good and to share with others, for with such sacrifices God is pleased.

11. Obey those who are given authority over you (17).
Heb. 13:17 Obey your leaders and submit to their authority. They keep watch over you as men who must give an account. Obey them so that their work will be a joy, not a burden, for that would be of no advantage to you.

Salutations

Heb. 13:18 Pray for us. We are sure that we have a clear conscience and desire to live honorably in every way. 19 I particularly urge you to pray so that I may be restored to you soon.

Heb. 13:20 May the God of peace, who through the blood of the eternal covenant brought back from the dead our Lord Jesus, that great Shepherd of the sheep, 21 equip you with everything good for doing his will, and may he work in us what is pleasing to him, through Jesus Christ, to whom be glory for ever and ever. Amen.

Heb. 13:22 Brothers, I urge you to bear with my word of exhortation, for I have written you only a short letter.

Heb. 13:23 I want you to know that our brother Timothy has been released. If he arrives soon, I will come with him to see you.

Heb. 13:24 Greet all your leaders and all God’s people. Those from Italy send you their greetings.

Heb. 13:25 Grace be with you all.



Posted in New Testament Text | Comments Off on Hebrews Text and Notes

Titus: Introduction and Outline Generated by Analyzing the Text

INTRODUCTION

Author

1:1  The writer called himself Paul.

       He saw himself as a servant of God.

       He was an apostle of Jesus Christ.

       His work was in the interest of the faith of God’s elect and the knowledge of the truth.

1:3  He preached the word that was entrusted to him by the command of God.

1:5  He left Titus in Crete to complete work he did not get done.

1:10, 11  He believed that rebellious deceivers should be silenced.

1:16  He believed that a person’s deeds proved whether they knew God or not.

2:1-10.  He believed that some doctrine is sound and other is not sound, and that sound doctrine   set forth a pattern for Christian conduct.

2:11  Subjected himself to the word of God, and did not subject it to himself.

2:13  He waited for the coming of Christ.

2:15  He believed a preacher had authority to teach, encourage, and rebuke.

3:3  He acknowledged that he also was once foolish, disobedient, deceived, and enslaved to         passions, and that only by God’s mercy he was saved.

3:12  He planned to send Artemas or Tychicus to Titus, so Titus could join him at Nicopolis,        where he planned to winter.

3:13, 14  He encouraged the support of missionaries.

3:15  He was sensitive to the love of the brethren.

Interpretive Summary: The writer was Paul. Paul described himself as an apostle and servant of God (1:1).  He had the message of God entrusted to him by God (1:3).  He believed in absolute truth, that there is truth and whatever is contrary to it is error.  He treated sound doctrine as a pattern for Christian conduct.  He also felt that rebellious deceivers should be silenced by those who love and teach the truth.  He believed this so strongly that he subjected himself to the word of God; he did not subject it to his control and change it.  He acknowledged that he was once a foolish, disobedient sinner who had been deceived, and that he was saved only by the mercy of God.  He not only loved truth, but he loved the brethren and wanted them to love him.

Recipient

1:4 – Paul wrote to Titus.

       Titus was Paul’s son in the faith.

       He was apparently under the training of Paul as a minister.

2:1, 3, 6, 9, 15; 3:1 – He was charged to teach God’s form of conduct to Christians.

3:3, 4 – He was also himself a sinner, and was saved by the mercy of God.

3:9 – He was to avoid foolish controversies, genealogies, arguments, and quarrels about the law,    and such unprofitable activity.

3:10 – He was to avoid rebellious people.

3:11 – He could be sure about the character of people–know them by their activities.

3:12 – He was to go to Paul at Nicopolis.

3:13 – He was to encourage missionaries.

3:13, 14 – He was to teach the church to be mission minded.

Interpretive Summary: The letter was written to Titus, who was apparently under Paul’s guidance as a minister (1:4).  Paul considered Titus as his son in the faith (1:4).  Titus was charged to teach God’s form of Christian conduct (2:1, 3, 6, 9, 15; 3:1).  He was to avoid controversies, genealogies, arguments, and quarrels about the law, and all unprofitable activity (3:9).  He was also charged to avoid rebellious people (3:10).  Finally, he was to be a promoter of mission work (3:13-14).

Occasion

1:5  Some work in Crete had been left unfinished.

1:5-9  Crete needed elders appointed to instruct and refute some who opposed sound doctrine.

1:5-9  The church needed guidance concerning God’s plan for church organization and leadership.

1:10, 16  There were rebellious people who were deceivers called the “circumcision group.”

1:16  These deceivers claimed to know God, but denied Him by their deeds.

2:1  The church in Crete needed to be instructed in sound doctrine.

2:2  The older men needed instruction in Christian conduct.

2:3  The older women needed instruction in their proper conduct.

2:6  The young men needed instruction in Christian behavior.

2:9  Christian slaves needed instructions in conduct toward their masters.

2:12  Some appear to have been slipping into ungodliness, worldly passions, a lack of self control,           and ungodly behavior.

3:1  Some appear to have been insubordinate to rulers and authorities.

3:1, 2  Some were apparently disobedient, not performing good works, slanderous, not peaceable             and considerate, and not humble.

3:3  There appears to have been some who were foolish, disobedient, deceived and enslaved by   passions and pleasure, living in malice and envy, and hating one another.

3:10  There appears to have been some divisive activity going on.

3:12  Paul was planning to winter at Nicopolis and wanted to see Titus there.

3:14  The Christians seemed to lack commitment to missions.

Interpretive Summary: The book reveals that the writer was training and guiding a young man in Christian ministry.  As a minister Titus faced many problems.  Paul had left him in Crete to appoint elders and to oppose false teachers who were working (1:5-16).  There were rebellious people who formed a “circumcision group,” so the church needed instruction in sound doctrine (1:10, 16; 2:1).  There were also Christians who needed instruction regarding proper Christian conduct (2:2-12).  Various groups needed special instruction concerning how to best serve God.  Some seem to have been drifting into ungodliness.  There appears to have been divisions developing among them (3:3).  There also seems to have been a lack of missionary zeal among these Christians (3:14).

Purpose

1:5, 6  Paul wrote to instruct Titus concerning how to perform his work in Crete:  to tell him how            to perform what was left undone and whom to appoint as elders.

1:6ff  Paul gave a plan or pattern concerning who should be appointed as elders.

1:11  Paul wanted the rebellious and deceivers of the circumcision group to be silenced.

2:1  Paul wanted Titus to teach sound doctrine about the conduct of older men, older women,       young men, an slaves.

2:14  Paul wanted the Christians to know that the grace of God taught proper conduct.

2:15  Paul wanted Titus to teach, encourage, and rebuke.

3:8  Paul wanted Titus to stress proper conduct.

3:9  Paul wanted Titus to know to avoid particular sins.

3:10  Titus was to warn and discipline divisive teachers.

3:14  Paul wanted Christians to learn to support missions.

3:15  Paul sent greetings to those who loved them. 

Interpretive Summary: Paul wrote to instruct Titus concerning how to perform his work in Crete (1:5-6).  Thus, he told him how to perform the work he had left undone (1:5-16).  Paul also wanted the deceivers of the “circumcision group” to be silenced.  Moreover, he wanted Titus to know how to conduct his life and to teach others by word and example in godly living.  He charged him to discipline divisive teachers.  Finally, he wanted Timothy to teach the church to support missions.

A Structural Analysis – Formed by (1) summarizing each paragraph in one sentence, (2) grouping paragraph summaries into groups that relate to common themes, (3) writing more general summaries of groups summaries, and writing even a more general summary of all group summaries. Thus, we arrive at the thesis, the major-points that support the thesis, and the sub-points that support the major-points.

OUTLINE

PAUL’S LETTER TO TITUS

One-Sentence Summaries of Paragraphs (NIV)

¶ 1 Paul greeted Titus as he wrote to exercise his apostleship by promoting faith and knowledge (1:1-4).
¶ 2 Paul left Titus at Crete to complete work that was left unfinished and appoint elders in every town (1:5-9).
¶ 3 Paul wanted Titus to silence deceivers who were troubling the churches by rebuking them sharply (1:10-16)
¶ 4 Paul wanted Titus to teach the older men their duties (2:1, 2).
¶ 5 Paul wanted Titus to teach the older women their duties (2:3-5).
¶ 6 Paul wanted Titus to teach the young men their duties (2:6-8).
¶ 7 Paul wanted Titus to teach the slaves their duties (2:9-10).
¶ 8 Paul wanted Titus to teach all Christians their duties (2:11-14).
¶ 9 Paul wanted Titus to stress that all Christians were all involved in foolishness, disobedience, and slavery to passion in the past, but we are now saved by mercy so all will be devoted to doing good (3:1-8).
¶ 10 Paul wanted Titus to avoid foolish controversies, genealogies, arguments, and q uarrels about the law because these are unprofitable and useless (3:9-11).
¶ 11 Paul told Titus about his plans to winter at Nicopolis and his desire to come there (3:12-15).

Paragraph Summaries Grouped and Summarized into One-Sentence Summaries

¶ 1 Paul greeted Titus as he wrote to exercise his apostleship by promoting faith and knowledge (1:1-4).


Summary of Thematic-Group 2 (paragraphs 2 & 3): Paul left Titus at Crete to set in order some matters left unfinished (1:5-16).


¶ 2 Paul left Titus at Crete to complete work that was left unfinished and appoint elders in every town (1:5-9).
¶ 3 Paul wanted Titus to silence deceivers who were troubling the churches by rebuking them sharply (1:10-16)


Summary of Thematic-Group 3 (paragraphs 4-7): Paul wanted Titus to teach sound doctrine by teaching specific groups their special duties (2:1-10).

¶ 4 Paul wanted Titus to teach the older men their duties (2:1, 2).
¶ 5 Paul wanted Titus to teach the older women their duties (2:3-5).
¶ 6 Paul wanted Titus to teach the young men their duties (2:6-8).
¶ 7 Paul wanted Titus to teach the slaves their duties (2:9-10).


Summary of Thematic-Group 4 (paragraphs 8-10): Paul wanted Titus to perform his ministerial duties by teaching Christians in general their duties (2:11-3:11).


¶ 8 Paul wanted Titus to teach all Christians their duties (2:11-14).
¶ 9 Paul wanted Titus to stress that all Christians were all involved in foolishness, disobedience, and slavery to passion in the past, but we are now saved by mercy so all will be devoted to doing good (3:1-8).
¶ 10 Paul wanted Titus to avoid foolish controversies, genealogies, arguments, and q uarrels about the law because these are unprofitable and useless (3:9-11).

¶ 11 Paul told Titus about his plans to winter at Nicopolis and his desire to come there (3:12-15).
Titus

One-Sentence Summary of All Thematic Groups

Summary of Group 1 (just paragraph 1) Paul greeted Titus as he wrote to exercise his apostleship by promoting faith and knowledge (1:1-4).


Summary of Group 2 (paragraphs 2 & 3): Paul left Titus at Crete to set in order some matters left unfinished (1:5-16).


Summary of Group 3 (paragraphs 4-7): Paul wanted Titus to teach sound doctrine by teaching to specific groups their special duties (2:1-10).


Summary of Group 4 (paragraphs 8-10): Paul wanted Titus to perform his ministerial duties by teaching Christians in general their duties (2:11-3:11).


¶ 11 Paul told Titus about his plans to winter at Nicopolis and his desire to come there (3:12-15).


Summary of all Group Summaries: Paul charged Titus to set the church in order by appointing elders, stopping the work of false teachers, and instructing the Christians in how to carry out their (1:1-3:15).

Titus

All Summaries Compiled into a Paragraph Outline

Introductory Greeting: Paul greeted Titus as he wrote to exercise his apostleship by promoting faith and knowledge (1:1-5).

INTRODUCTION:

I. Paul, an apostle of Jesus Christ, wrote this letter to Titus.
II. Paul wrote this letter to Titus (5).
III. Thesis: Paul charged Titus to set the church in order by appointing elders, stopping the work of false teachers, and instructing the Christians in how to carry out their work (1:1-3:15).

DISCUSSION:
I. Paul left Titus at Crete to set in order some matters left unfinished (1:5-16).
A. Paul left Titus at Crete to complete work that was left unfinished and appoint elders in every town (1:5-9).
B. Paul wanted Titus to silence deceivers who were troubling the churches by rebuking them sharply (1:10-16).

II. Paul wanted Titus to teach sound doctrine by teaching to specific groups their special duties (2:1-10).
A. Paul wanted Titus to teach the older men their duties (2:1, 2).
B. Paul wanted Titus to teach the older women their duties (2:3-5).
C. Paul wanted Titus to teach the young men their duties (2:6-8).
D. Paul wanted Titus to teach the slaves their duties (2:9-10).

III. Paul wanted Titus to perform his ministerial duties by teaching Christians in general their duties (2:11-3:11).
A. Paul wanted Titus to teach all Christians grace teaches duties (2:11-14).
B. Paul wanted Titus to stress that all Christians were all involved in foolishness, disobedience, and slavery to passion in the past, but we are now saved by mercy so all will be devoted to doing good (3:1-8).
C. Paul wanted Titus to avoid foolish controversies, genealogies, arguments, and q uarrels about the law because these are unprofitable and useless (3:9-11).

CONCLUSION: Paul told Titus about his plans to winter at Nicopolis and his desire for Titus to meet him there (3:12-15).

Posted in New Testament Text | Comments Off on Titus: Introduction and Outline Generated by Analyzing the Text

How to Establish Divine Authority

HOW TO ESTABLISH DIVINE AUTHORITY FOR FAITTH AND PRACTICES

THE SILENCE OF THE SCRIPTURES AND PATTERN AUTHORITY

INTRODUCTION:

I. Thesis: Through seeking to understand what practices are right and wrong for Christians, biblical interpreters have discovered the following hermeneutical principle of inclusion and exclusion that is operational in both testaments.

Whatever is without biblical authority is excluded from Christian faith and practice; therefore, to act without biblical authority lacks God’s approval. As Christians, we must honor the silence of the Scriptures and abide by the pattern of worship, work, doctrine, organization and spirit set forth in the New Testament. General authority includes everything within the bounds of the authorizing statement; specific authority excludes every form, means, and method outside the bounds of the authorizing specific authority; having no biblical authority excludes whatever Scripture is silent about. I do not mean that there was a perfect local church in the New Testament that we should strive to be just like. I do mean that we must strive to be just like the directives and correctives given in God’s perfect word.

II. The motive for this principle is not just to be different, narrow, and judgmental.
A. We do not simply wish to be different, but we are only striving to do right by submitting to the authority of God.
B. We do not delight in saying others are wrong; we only strive to know and to aid others in knowing what is right and what is wrong. Because of our love for God, we want to please Him, and it is by knowing what is right and what is wrong that we know how to submit to and  please Him.

C. We want to assume that all who profess Christianity want to know His will and are willing to submit to it when they come to know it..

D. We assume that others are as sincere as we are and wish to treat them as we wish to be treated–let God judge their motives.

III. We do not question the motives of those engaging in activities that are without biblical authority nor deny that God’s grace reaches those in Christ who are sincerely wrong.
A. We are not saying that unauthorized activity is wrong in itself, but it is wrong when practiced on occasions when it is not authorized by the Bible.
B. We do not mean to say nor imply that all who engage in unauthorized activities are vicious and rebellious haters of God and of truth.
C. We neither believe nor teach that there is no grace for those in Christ who are doing wrong because of imperfect understanding.
D. We do not desire to judge who is lost or saved.
E. We are only saying that involvement in activities that are without biblical authority is wrong, and we must never persist doing what we know is wrong.

IV. We wish to avoid Pharisaic attitudes and unwarranted legalism, but we want to submit to the authority of the Scriptures.
A. We do not want to be like the Pharisees who delight in condemning and throwing stones at others while we are blinded to our own errors.
B. We do not wish to be legalists who claim that we can be saved only if we are perfectly correct in understanding and in conduct.
C. On the other hand, we do not wish to be libertines who don’t strive to know the will of God, use freedom in Christ as an occasion to the flesh, or sin because we are not under law but under grace (Gal. 5:13; Rom 6:15).
D. Neither do we want to be antinomians who don’t believe God has a law for us.

V. We wish to understand the balance of law, grace and faith.
A. We are not under law as a basis of salvation, but under grace as the grounds of our salvation (Rom. 6:15).
B. Christ not only gives us grace to save us, but He also gives us truth to guide us (John 1:14, 17; 4:24; 14:6; 17:17).
C. A saving faith is a submissive faith that seeks to know and obey God’s will (Rom. 1:5; 16:26; Gal. 5:6; James 2:14-26; Heb. 11; cf. Acts 6:7).
1. Submissive faith seeks to know God’s will–what is right and what is wrong.
2. Faith that deliberately chooses to remain ignorant or disregards truth also forfeits grace (Heb. 10:26).
D. Christianity is truly a religion of mercy, but it is also a religion of authority. When Christ extended His grace, He did not also give His authority over to men. He extended grace to men under authority.
E. Christianity is a religion of grace, but it is also a religion of law.
F. Christianity is a religion of love, but it is also a religion of truth. When Christ calls for love and unity, He did not declare his standard of right and wrong null and void. He taught unity through both submission and the extension of grace.
G. We must serve and worship Christ in spirit, but we must worship and serve Him in truth (John 4:24).

VI. Any rule that allows religious action without biblical authority makes mankind their own authority (i.e., their own god) concerning what to do in the work and worship of the church and opens the door to innumerable unauthorized practices.

DISCUSSION – SUPPORT FOR THE THESIS:

I. The Christianity of the Bible operates exclusively by divine authority in all its faith and practices.

A. There are several views of authority in religion.
1. The atheist holds the view that there is no God over man.
2. The theists who reject the Judaeo-Christian view of God exclude the authority of God, Christ, and the Bible.
3. Non-Christian Jews reject the authority of Christ and the New Testament, and are guided by the Old Testament plus their traditions (Matt. 15:1-9).
4. Catholics claim that the church is the mother of the Scripture and that her ecclesiastical laws have the same/or more binding force as the Bible–that the Bible is not our only guide.
5. Protestantism generally proposes to require what is expressly enjoined, to reject what is expressly forbidden, and to feel free to practice what is not expressly forbidden (whether authorized or not).
6. Modern cults and creedalists give homage to the Bible, but they accept their church rules as having a binding force equal to the Bible–often preferring them over the Bible.
7. Those who are committed to restoring New Testament Christianity propose to observe everything that is required by expressed statement, necessary implication, or approved apostolic example; to abstain from everything that is forbidden by expressed statement, necessary implication, or apostolic example; and to refrain from everything that is not authorized by expressed statement, necessary implication, or apostolic example.

B. Biblical authority is essential to make a belief or practice acceptable to God.
1. There are two possible sources of authority (Matt. 21:23-27). Some operate by the authority of men. Some strive to act only by the authority of God.
2. Man must seek God’s authority for his actions. Human thoughts and ways cannot compare to the thoughts and ways of God (Isa. 55:8, 9). The way of man is not in himself (Jer. 10:23). Jesus Christ is Lord–i.e., the only one who has a right to master, direct, govern, or control our lives (Mt. 28:18; 1 Pet. 3:15; Mt. 7:21; Lk. 6:46).
3. God authorizes and guides through the Bible. God deserves to be in authority. He is creator of man and all things (Gen. 1-3; Jn. 1:1-18). He is Sustainer of all things (Acts 17:28-29; Col. 1:16-17). ( He owns us through redemption (I Cor. 6:19, 20; 10:26).
Christ exercises exclusive authority, which He administers through apostolic teachings. God gave all authority to the resurrected Christ (Matt. 28: 18-20; Eph. l:22, 23; Col. l:18). The Apostles were endowed with authority through the Holy Spirit (John 14:26; 16:13; Matt. 16:18, 19), and their word became normative–God’s divine standard (Gal. 1:6-9). The apostles had the power to set forth divine teachings through laying their hands on select people in the church. Others upon whom the Apostles laid their hands set forth an authoritative message (I Cor. 12-14; Acts 8; Eph. 3:5).
The Scripture is God’s exclusive source of authority in religion (2 Tim. 3:16,17; James 1:25; Gal. 1:6-9; I Cor. 4:6; 2 John 9-11; Jude 3; Rev. 22:18,19; Matt. 15: 1-9; Mark 7:1-7; Matt. 7:13-22). The inspired apostolic teachings were the source of the only one true Christian faith (Eph. 4:4, 5); this faith is revealed in the New Testament (Gal. 1:23; 3:23; Rom. 10:17), and we must act by faith (2 Cor. 5:7; Heb. 11:6).
4. The Bible authorizes in three ways. An expressed statement authorizes actions. An expressed account of action sanctions the action. And an expressed command requires the action.
When an express statement, text, or context necessarily implies something not expressed, the necessary implication authorizes faith and practices.
An approved account of action authorizes. However, an approved example may only gives permission. But an example is binding when it is obvious that the action is a response to a background command or antecedent theology.
5.Biblical authority may only permit an action, but, on the other hand, it may require the action. Statements and implications that describe give permission. Statements and implications with the force of command require an action.
Examples may be binding, but they may give permission without being binding imperatives. When an account of action illustrates antecedent theology (i.e., has a background command or is rooted in he nature of God), it binds a required action. Also, when a reported action is done in response to a necessary implication, it has binding force. Likewise, when an account of action gives evidence that the action was required, it is of binding force.
6. Biblical authority may be local and temporary, or it may be universal and permanent. When the context of an authorization expressly limits the time, purpose and its subjects, it is local and temporary. Also, authority is local and temporary when the account or its context implies it was limited in time and scope (e.g. Gen. 6:13-22; 2 Tim. 4:9-18). Likewise, subsequent revelation might limit the time and scope of the authority by indicating a change. Without the foregoing limitations, authority is universal and permanent.
7. Biblical authority may be inclusive or exclusive. General authority that does not specify persons, methods, times, places,
things, or means authorizes anything within the limits (i.e., bounds) of the authorizing statement, example, command, or implication.
Specific authority that gives specific guidance regarding time, place, method, means, etc. excludes anything that is an addition to that which is specified (cf. point III).
Specific and general authority relate to current questions and concepts in the following ways. (a) Specific authority imposes form, but general authority grants freedom. (b) Specific authority is exclusive, but general authority is inclusive. (c) Specific authority makes particulars matters of faith, but general authority leaves particulars in the area of opinion. (d) Specific authority binds particulars as law, but general authority leaves particulars as matters of expediency or opinion. (e) To either forbid or require a specific in the realm of general biblical authority is creedalism and is inspired by demonic forces (Matt. 16:18, 19; I Tim. 4:1-4). (f) To allow anything excluded by specific authority is liberalism and is without the approval and blessing of God–is wrong (II John 9-11).
Note the following observations regarding pattern authority and the silence of the Scripture. a. When authority is specific, the following propositions are true: (a) Specific authority establishes an exclusive form or pattern. (b) The silence of the Scriptures regarding particulars not included requires that we neither require nor allow any activity excluded by specific authority.
When authority is general, the following propositions are true:
(a) General authority forbids that any form or pattern be required, but that freedom be allowed in regard to the particulars within the limits of that general authority. (b) Therefore, under general authority, the silence of the Scriptures in regard to particulars forbids any rules either forbidding or requiring particulars within the bounds of such general authority.
By the authority given to them by Christ (i.e., the keys of the kingdom), the inspired writers bound the church to some forms (i.e., patterns) and loosed the church (i.e., granted freedom) in other areas, according to what God had bound or loosed in heaven (Mt. 16:18, 19).
(a)We honor the silence of the Scriptures by neither loosing what God has bound (i.e., granting freedom in areas where He specified form) nor binding what God has loosed (i.e., imposing form where He granted freedom). (b) In keeping with this, where the Bible speaks, we speak; and where the Bible is silent, we are silent. (c) Likewise, we seek to practice Christianity according to the pattern set forth in the New Testament. (d) In other words, we are seeking to restore the forms and freedoms Christ teaches in the New Testament in the lives of believers and churches today.

II. Specific Biblical authority excludes all additions.

A. A common-sense approach to Bible study shows that specific authority is exclusive.
l. Jacob’s bargain with Laban for the speckled and spotted sheep, black lambs, and spotted and speckled goats excluded all other livestock; any others taken into his flock would have been “stolen” (Gen. 30:31-43).
2. God’s commandment requiring “a red heifer without defect, in which there is no blemish, and upon which a yoke has never come” and requiring “male lambs a year old without blemish” were exclusive and ruled out all that did not fit those specific descriptions or categories (Numbers 19:2; 28:3, 9, 11; 29:17, 26).
3. When Abel offered “of the firstlings of the flock” “by faith,” he offered what God required (Gen. 4:4; Heb. 11:4; Rom. 10:17), and when Cain offered something else, he did not act by faith and did not do well. His offering was not acceptable to God (Gen. 4:5-7).
4. When Noah built the ark of gopher wood as God instructed, he acted by faith and pleased God (Gen. 6:14-16; Heb. 11:7). If he had used other wood or violated the specific instructions of God, he would not have pleased God.
5. Above all, God Himself honored the principle that specific authority excludes everything except what is specified–the law of exclusion. When God planned for Christ to be our High Priest in the Christian system, He could not do so and honor the specific command in the Old Testament law that high priests must be descendants of Aaron of the tribe of Levi. So He did away with the Old Testament Law and established the New Testament Law (Hebrews 7:12-14). Before the law of Moses, God made Melchizedek (not of the specified tribe of Levi) a priest.  While “the law” was in force, only those of the tribe of Levi could be priests.   After the Law of Moses was abolished, He made Jesus (not of the specified tribe of Levi) a priest.  Specific authority demanded this! So, the law of exclusion by specific authority is an eternal and universal law–submitted to by God Himself!  Under The Old Testament Law, Christ could not be a priest on earth (Hebrews 8:4-5).

6. The above is an accepted law of language that we honor every day.  If you ask for “a cup of coffee,” this general language leaves it open for you to be served coffee with or without sugar and with or without cream.  This general language allows for either black coffee, coffee with sugar, coffee with cream, or coffee with both sugar and cream.  However, if you ask for “a cup of black coffee,” this request can only be fulfilled by coffee without sugar or cream.  The specific language is exclusive and would be violated by any addition or subtraction.

When a physician submits a prescription to the pharmacist, we expect the pharmacist to fill the prescription without addition or subtraction.  Addition to or subtraction from the specifics of the prescription could render the medicine either ineffective or fatal.  In either case, additions and subtractions are violations of the orders, unacceptable, and could lead to pharmacists having their licenses revoked.

Some say that this principle may be applied in everyday affairs such as the above, but not in a study of the Bible.  This is simply saying that in interpreting the Bible, the laws of language do not apply.  This means that some think that Bible study in not a rational pursuit.  This I cannot begin to accept.  The Bible itself indicates otherwise.  Surely, God is not irrational; neither should we be in studying His word!

B. Willful rejection of exclusive authority invites God’s wrath.

1. When Nadab and Abihu took strange (unholy) fire into their censers they used fire God “had not commanded them,” and God punished them for their disobedience (Lev. 16:12; 10: 1-3).
2. When Korah, Dathan, and Abiram tried to impose men other than those specifically ordered for the priestly service (i.e., the sons of Levi), they were in rebellion against God, and the earth swallowed them (Number 16).
3. Hebrews 7:11-19 interprets the Old Testament regulations regarding who could serve as priests by applying the law of exclusion by specific authority. Neither Melchizedek nor Jesus, neither being of the tribe of Levi, qualified for the priesthood according to the law. They both had to be especially appointed by God; only God could set aside the law.
4. When Saul offered the burnt offering in violation of God’s specific requirement for Samuel to offer it, he displeased God and lost his favor (I Sam. 13:8-15; 10:8).
5. When the Jews added to God’s law concerning worship and by tradition or commandment or men practiced unauthorized hand washing and other ceremonies, they made their religion vain (Mark 7:1-7; Matt. 15:1-9).

C. The basic Protestant principle that approves or requires unauthorized activities in Christian work and worship contradicts the exclusive authority of Christ.
1. Zwingli, in Switzerland, advocated excluding all things not authorized by the Bible. This led to the abolition of instrumental music from worship along with other unauthorized practices (F. W. Mattox, The Eternal Kingdom, pp. 255-257).
2. Martin Luther, in Germany, advocated allowing anything not expressly forbidden. This could have allowed mass for the dead, auricular confession, purgatory, infallibility of popes, et. al. (Mattox, pp. 255-257; J. W. Shepherd, The Church, The Falling Away and the Restoration, p. 115).

D. The problem of instrumental music in Christian worship illustrates this principle.
1. All biblical references to music in Christian worship specifically refers to singing.
2. Therefore, these specific references to singing, along with the silence of the Bible on mechanical instrumental music in Christian worship, exclude mechanical instruments of music in Christian worship.
(a) All New Testament references to music in Christian worship of God exclusively call for singing (Matt. 26:30; Acts. 16:25; Eph. 5:18, 19; Col. 3:16; Heb. 13:15; James 5:13). (b) Therefore, singing is the only music authorized for the congregation (Heb. 2:12) and for the assembly of Christians specifically required on the first day of the week (I Cor. 14:15, 22, 26; 16: 1, 2).

E. The question of when to take the Lord’s Supper and how often is decided on the basis of specific authority in the New Testament.  The New Testament gives apostolic authority that is specific for when to take the Lord’s Supper; that is on the first day of every week (Acts 20:7; 1 Cor. 11:20-22; 16:1-2).  The church at Troas came together on the first day of the week for the purpose of taking the Lord’s Supper.  Paul rebuked the church at Corinth for not recognizing the purpose of their assembly as to take the Lord’s Supper.  In 1 Corinthians 16:1-2, Paul states that they came together on the first day of every week.  So the Scripture excludes any other time for taking the Lord’s Supper and requires that it be taken every first day of the week.  Likewise, the specific requirement for bread and “fruit of the vine” excludes cake and ice-cream or steak from the supper.

III. Generic (non specific) matters permits any particular that fits within the purview or aids in carrying out a specific command (but does not add to it) is permitted or left to our judgment.

A. When God told Noah to build the ark, He gave specific orders about its size, the windows, the doors. But, He did not specify the tools to use. Noah could not change what God specified, but he could choose his tools.

B. When Jesus told us to go and preach the gospel, He did not specify the mode of travel, so we can decide whether we go by airplane, car, motorcycle, or walk.

C. It is just as wrong to bind specifics where God did not as it is to add to the specifics God gave us.

CONCLUSION:

I. If we abide by this divine principle of Biblical interpretation, we will submit not only to express commands, but will also submit to pattern authority and the silence of the Scripture.

II. If we deny pattern authority and the restrictions imposed by the silence of the Scripture, we open the door to any and every activity that the Scripture does not expressly forbid.

William T. (Bill) Lambert, Ed. D. Professor Emeritus College of Bible and Religion Harding University Searcy, AR 72149-0001

Posted in How to Study the Bible | Tagged | Comments Off on How to Establish Divine Authority

Discovery Learning in the Bible

Introduction

I. The ultimate goal of Bible study is to learn its significance for our lives—how it applies to us.

II. We must first discover what the Bible means before we can determine how it applies.  If we seek to discover how it applies before we know what it means, we will seriously misunderstand its meaning and application.  We must know the historical meaning of a text (what it meant to them, then and there) before we can know its application (what it means to us, here and now).

III. Always remember the following.

A. We cannot know how the Bible applies until we know what it means.

B. We cannot know what the Bible means until we know what it says.

C. We must, therefore, ask the following three questions:  1) What does this biblical text say?  2) What does this biblical text mean?  3) How does this biblical text apply.

Discussion

I. Pray for God’s help in your study of the Bible. Bible study is both a rational process and a spiritual process.

A. Since God has sought to communicate to man through a rational communication—the Bible, we must approach biblical interpretation rationally.  However, since we are attempting to understand the infinite mind of an infinite God, we need divine help in our understanding.  Paul told the Corinthians that man cannot know God’s redemptive truth by scientific exploration or physical observation [e.g., “eye” or “ear”] nor by philosophical activity [i.e., “the mind of man”] (1 Cor. 2:7-9).  Man does not know the mind of God, anymore than we know the minds of other people, until it is revealed to us.  Just as only the spirits in people know their minds, only the Spirit of God knows the mind of God.  So God’s mind had to be revealed by the Holy Spirit (1 Cor. 2:7-13).  The Bible presents to us the mind of God as revealed through the inspiration of the Holy Spirit.

B. Even though the truth of God has been revealed and recorded in the Bible, the natural man has difficulty in understanding this Revelation—the Bible.  Paul indicates that we need the aid of the Holy Spirit in understanding this revelation (1 Cor. 2:14-16).  It also stands to reason that the Spirit that dwells in us will help us to understand the Bible.  Communication of God’s truth has been a primary work of the Spirit.  Since He dwells in the Christian, it would seem absurd for Him to not help us understand the Bible.  Why would He not help us understand that which He has so diligently sought to communicate to us? Therefore, I am advocating a divinely-aided rational approach to Bible study!

C. Four things should be obvious.  First, God will not “reveal” one interpretation to one person, another meaning to someone else, and even another meaning to someone else.  The Spirit is not  confused and does not contradict himself.  Second, He will not “reveal” a meaning for a text that is not supported by the details in the text. Third, He will not “reveal” a meaning that contradicts the details in the text.  Fourth, He will not “reveal” an interpretation that contradicts other plain passages. Meaning will be supported by the historical setting of the text and the facts within the text.

 

II. Read the document (biblical book) in which your text is found over several times.

A. You must be a Bible reader before you can be a Bible scholar.  Through extensive general reading of the Old Testament and New Testament, you can build biblical perception of God and His purpose, Christ and His mission, and Christianity and its function.  Cumulative reading of the Bible regularly and extensively creates the knowledge that will enable you to screen interpretations and applications of specific teachings to see if they are in harmony with or contradict the biblical view of God.

B. You should read the book you wish to study several times before you seek to do deeper study (Kaiser 71-72; Fee 28; Torrey 14).  Read it as many times as possible at one siting.  This exercise will help you to see threads of thought that run throughout the book.  It will make key words and ideas stand out.  Through this reading the book will get hold of the mind.  It will make each following step far more meaningful and easier.  G. Campbell Morgan’s publisher said he would read a biblical book fifty times before he wrote an analysis or interpretative exposition of it (Morgan, Analyzed Bible, iii).

 

III. Seek to put yourself in the situation of the writer and first readers by performing a historical analysis. (Note: A historical analysis of the book in which your passage is found will reveal information about its author, recipients, occasion, and purpose.  This information will be more often implied than stated explicitly.  By performing a historical analysis, you can write your own introduction to a book.)

A. Gather information about the writer and his/her situation from the biblical book by asking the following questions.

1. Who wrote the book?

2. What were the circumstances of the writer?

3. Where was the writer?

4 What is revealed (i.e., stated or implied) about the character of the writer?

B. Gather information about the recipients of the writing, its first readers, from the biblical book by asking the following questions:

1. To whom was the book written?

2. What were the circumstances of the recipients?

3. Where were the recipients?

4. What is revealed (i.e., stated or implied) about the character of the recipients?

C. Gather information concerning the occasion of the writing of the book  (i.e., what was going on that caused the writer to write the book) from the biblical book.  Look for direct statements or implications about what was going on with the recipients that created the need for the book.  Note:  Much of this information will overlap with information about the recipients.

D.  Gather information concerning the purpose for writing the book from the biblical book.  Sometimes this will be explicitly stated in the book (e.g., 1 John).  However, usually this will be implied by the content of the book.  (Note:  Don’t be surprised that much of this information will overlap with that concerning the occasion.  This is natural since purpose is what the writer is trying to accomplish to correct the problem or meet the need indicated by the occasion.

IV.  Look at your text in the logical context of the book, i.e., perform a structural analysis of the book and write an outline of it. This process will reveal what the central argument of the book is and the function of each part in the argument.  It will show how each part relates to other parts and to the whole.  It will show the function of your text in the entire book.

A.  First, in your own words, write a one-sentence summary that states the central idea of each paragraph.  (Note:  Each sentence should be general enough to cover everything in the paragraph.  If your language is too specific, you will either leave some thoughts out or your sentence will go on and on in an effort to cover everything.

B. Second, group all paragraph summaries that support the same general idea into one group.

C. Third, write a one sentence summary of each group of paragraphs by summarizing that group’s summaries into one sentence; this states the single central idea of each section.

D. Fourth, write a summary of all section summaries; this states the theme of the book.

E. Fifth, form an outline by the process of coordination and subordination

1. The one summary of all section summaries will serve as the thesis (i.e., one big idea that the entire document is designed to develop—i.e., explain, prove, illustrate, apply) of the whole book.

2. Each section summary (summary of groups of paragraph summaries) will serve as a major point.

3. Each paragraph summary will serve as a sub-point.

 

V.  Closely analyze the text to see what the Bible actually says.

A.  Likely, the most accurate analysis of a text is a syntactical analysis—a grammatical diagram of each sentence in the paragraph being studied.

1. Pick out the subject, verb, and complement (direct object and subject complement).  When this is written out, it will form the kernel sentence.

2. Break the remainder of the sentence down into meaningful parts—words, phrases, and clauses.

3. Write the modifying word, phrase, or clause under the part of the kernel or other modifier that it tells something about.

4.  After rewriting the text in diagrammatic form that shows the relationship of each part to each other and to the whole, state each element of the diagrammed text in propositional form.

B.  You may omit the syntactical analysis and perform a “Propositional Analysis” only. This analysis is called a “Propositional Analysis” because it is an attemp to state everything contained in a text in propositional form.  (Note:  When you omit the syntactical analysis, you run the risk of not being as accurate in your analysis.)

1.  In performing a propositional analysis, you focus on paragraphs as units of study.

2.  After you determine the paragraph you wish to study, first seek to discern the main simple statement made by each sentence and write it down.

3.  Second, separate each modifying element in each sentence and write in propositional form what it says about the element it qualifies or tells more about.

4.  After writing all propositions included in the paragraph, you summarize what the paragraph reveals about its main truth assertion—topic or theme.

C.  A third type of textual analysis is an “Interrogative Analysis.”

1.  In performing an interrogative analysis, you study topics or themes by probing them with interrogatives: What?  Who?  Which one?  What kind?  How many?  When?  Where?  Why?  How?  To what extent?  To whom?  For whom?  By whom? etc.

2.  The first step in performing an interrogative analysis is to discover the passages that give information about a topic or theme developed in your text by using a concordance.

a.  There are verbal concordances that list all passages dealing with the particular word you wish to examine.  Young’s Analytical Concordance and Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance are verbal concordances.

1) Young’s lists passages including the particular Greek word translated in text from which your study originated.  You will study the texts in which the Greek word for your topic or theme is translated.  Young’s concordance is based on the KJV.  There are “analytical” concordances based on other versions.

2) Strong’s assigns a numbers to the passages that represent specific Greek words.  You study the passages marked with the number assigned to the word found in the text where your word first appears.  Strong’s concordance is also based on the KJV.  There are other “exhaustive” concordances that are based on other versions.

3) You simply look up the word used in the text to find book-chapter-verse references for all texts where the theme is dealt with.

b.  There are conceptual concordances that list passages where a theme or topic (concept) is dealt with, but the specific word does not occur (e.g., Nave’s Topical Bible; Topical Analysis of the Bible, Elwell ed., Baker; Topical Indes and Digest ,Monser, Baker).  There are several such topical lists of references.

c.  There are several search programs for both PC and Mac computers.  These enable you to enter a word and have all passages that use it to appear on your screen instantly.  These programs speed up this process greatly.

3.  The second step involves seeking answers to as many of the interrogatives as each passage answers.  Some passages may include answer to only one interrogative.  Other passages may answer several interrogatives.

a. You should probe each passage where a theme is found with all of the interrogatives.

b.  Record all answers given by each passage.

c.  After you record all answers possible, write out all that is taught about your topic or theme of interest.

4.  Note: Instead of using a concordance, you may discover the passages in a particular biblical book by reading the entire text of the book and recording all passages where topic or theme is dealt with.  Then proceed to probe each of the texts with the interrogatives, record all answers, and then draw a conclusion about what these passages teach on the topic.

VI. Perform an analysis (“Theological-Word Analysis”) of all key words in the text to establish the complete and precise meaning of each word.

A. Perform a study of each key word in Greek-English lexicons.

1.  Establish the Greek word in the text by using a Greek New Testament (or if you are not a skilled student of Greek, in a Greek-English Interlinear New Testament).

2.  Determine the lexical form of the word by parsing the word (or if you are not a skilled student of Greek, by using an Analytical Greek Lexicon).

3.  Establish the semantic field (general meaning) and the semantic context (specific meaning of the word in your text) by using a standard Greek-English Lexicon (e.g., Bauer, Arndt, Gingrich, & Danker.).

B.  Perform a study of the usage of the key words—an independent study of word meaning.

1.  Discover passages where the word is used by consulting a Concordance.  (Note: Make sure that the passages you study use the same Greek word as the one translated in your text.)

2.  Probe each passage where the word is used and make notes of your observations about the writer’s use of the word in each passage. There are internal helps that help you to discover meaning of words in a text.

a. The writer’s own definition may be given in the text.

b. Often there are parallelisms that state meaning in other words.

c. When opposites are stated in the text, this helps to understand meaning.

d. What the word is associated with in the text gives insights into meaning.

e. The subject and verb in the sentence also provide insights, especially concerning figurative language.

3. Draw a conclusion concerning the meaning of the word and write it out—even if it takes a paragraph.  Note:  This provides insights into a writer’s theology on a theme as well as insights into word meaning.

VII.  Discover the significance of the text—how it applies to us here and now.

A.  There are three basic divisions of biblical interpretation:  analysis, interpretation, and application.  Bible knowledge is of little or no value if you do not know how it applies. But remember, you cannot know what the Bible means until you know what it says. Likewise, you cannot know how the Bible applies until you first know what it means.

B.  After we as interpreters discovers what a text meant to its first readers (i.e., what the author meant to say),  we must seek to discover what it means to us. In order to know what it means to us, we must bridge the time and culture gap between Bible times and now.  This is done by stripping the teaching of its cultural and situational trappings and applying the principle (i.e., universal and eternal truth) to ourselves in our cultural and situational context.  This process is called “Contextualization” (Osborne), “hermeneutics” (Fee and Stuart), “transposing the word” (Stott), “transferring the message” (Greidanus), and “principalizing” (Kaiser).  In the following lists of suggestions, I will share with you some suggested activities for applying the message of God and presenting the message in the form of a contemporary and living message from God.

C.  In The Contemporary Christian, John R. W. Stott says that the sense of remoteness and difficulty we often experience when we read the Bible is “not due primarily to the passage           of time . . . nor to the mere distance . . . , but to the cultural differences which remoteness of time and place have caused”.  He calls this experience “a collision of cultures between the biblical world and the modern world.”  He also says that this cultural gap often causes readers “to ask impatiently, ‘What on earth has that old book got to say to me?’” (186).

D.  Sidney Greidanus (The Modern Preacher and the Ancient Test) agrees as he discusses the relevance of the sermon:  “Without genuine relevance there is no sermon.  Relevance for the church here and now is the final goal of sermon preparation, yet sermons that have           remained on the right track through the process of text selection, theme formulation, and form selection often derail at the point where the message for Israel or the early church must be transformed into a relevant sermon for contemporary congregations (157). Greidanus warns against selecting a text, formulating a sermon theme, and selecting a sermon form “without an eye to the congregation.”  He also warns against reflecting on the relevance of the sermon “without an eye to the text” (157).  E.  In his Toward an Exegetical Theology, Walter Kaiser says that “after the interpreter has met all the requirements of investigating the grammar, syntax, literary structure, and history” of the text, something further is needed.  He calls this need “theological exegesis” (131).  He points out that the expositor can get caught in the trap of “historicism” or “descriptionism.”  Then he immediately adds, “The Achilles heel for men among the trained clergy is the failure to bring the Biblical text from BC. or first-century AD. context and to relate it directly and legitimately to the present day” (131).

F.  Grant Osborne, in The Hermeneutical Spiral, emphasizes the need for application calling it “Contextualization” (318).  He says, “We cannot finally separate exegesis from application, meaning from significance, because they are two aspects of the same hermeneutical act” (118).  “The preacher’s task is to ensure that the Word speaks as clearly today as it did in ancient times” (318).  “Contextualization is ‘that dynamic process which interprets the significance of a religion or cultural norm for a group with a different (or developed) cultural heritage’” (318).  “The key issue is ‘relevance’; religious principles constantly must be adapted to meet new cultural challenges” (319).

G.  Gordon Fee and Douglas Stuart say, in How to Read the Bible for all it’s Worth, “The big issue among Christians committed to Scripture as God’s Word has to do with the problem of cultural relativity, what is cultural and therefore belongs to the first century alone and what transcends culture and is thus a word for all seasons.”

H.  There are three kinds of imperatives or normative teachings in the Bible.

1.  Universals which are universal, principles that transcend cultural context and are required in every age.  These imperatives reflect the moral and ethical character of God (e.g., “Thou shalt love the Lord thy God . . . and thy neighbor as thyself” (Mk. 12:29-31).

2.  General principles which apply moral and ethical law and transfer directly from culture       to culture; these are supracultural and transcultural imperatives (e.g., “Thou shalt not covet.”).  This differs from number 1 in that it is more specific and applies the general principle in a more specific way, a particular that is not culture bound, but can be applied in any and all cultures.

3.  Culture-specific or culture-bound commands, which are tied to ancient, even specific that these forms are rooted in the cultural particulars, experiences, and situations of particular people.  Also, there is no evidence that these particulars are rooted in the nature of God nor anything that relates to core matters in Christianity.  Note:  There are some particular forms or even cultural particulars that were bound and have transfer       because they symbolize important aspects of God’s nature or salvific events in salvation history—redemptive acts (e.g., baptism’s relationship to the death, burial, and resurrection of Christ).

I.  Our problem in determining significance or in applying Scripture relates to the third kind of imperatives above—how do we distinguish cultural and situational particulars that are local and temporary from particulars that are universal and permenant?

1.  Be careful not to totally reject the Bible because the culture reflected in it is out of date.       Granted, if we cling to cultural particulars, rather than principles, we make the Bible seem to be “out of date.”  Nevertheless, if we disregard all particulars, including those       that are rooted in the nature of God or related to core matters, we will depart from the norm established by God.

2.  Be careful not to give equal authority to the principles illustrated by cultural particulars and the cultural particulars that apply or express these eternal principles.  If werecognize unbound cultural particulars as incidentals while retaining and showing the purpose of particulars that were assigned universal and eternal value, we will maintain a biblical stance while showing the relevance and timeliness of biblical truth.  Remember, cultural particulars and application may change, but divine truth does not       change.

3.  Osborne said, “The major difficulty in contextualizing Scripture is deciding exactly what are the cultural or time-bound elements in a passage and what are the surpacultural or eternal principles” (326).  He added, “All biblical statements are authoritative; some, however, are so dependent upon the ancient cultural setting that they cannot apply to today since there are no parallels (such as footwashing or meat offered to idols).  We       need hermeneutical criteria to enable us to make such decisions on firm ground” (327).  We must remember that the principles expressed in these optional particulars are timeless standards (e.g., footwashing to express brotherly love and hospitality and       abstaining from meat to express the fact that the feelings and the salvation of our fellow Christians are more important than our own cultural preferences or personal freedom).

4.  Part of our task is to strip away unbound cultural and situational specifics, to apply the principles they illustrate and establish, and to show particular ways in which these principles must be applied in our culture and our various situations. Another part of our task is to show the reason for retaining and observing the modes and methods (i.e., patterns and forms) established by bound particulars and to urge their observance upon ourselves and others.

J.  I have gleaned and evaluated some guiding rules for determining significance (contextualizing) or applying the biblical tachings. Tentatively, I think the following have merit.

1.  We must always establish the historical meaning of a text before we try to understand its current significance (i.e., Discover what it meant to them, then, and there before we decide what it means to us, here, and now).

2.  Clearly stated didactic (i.e., teaching) passages should be used in interpreting historical passages (i.e., accounts of action) and other didactic passages that are difficult to interpret.

3.  We must interpret Scripture and seek application that is in harmony with the canonical context of the Bible (i.e., the broader central message of the whole) and with the theological context of the Bible (i.e., biblical view of God).  If an interpretation or application is in conflict with the central teaching of the Bible or the nature of God, it is obviously being misinterpreted or misapplied.

4.  We must seek to understand the command behind any account of action.  Any command that was local and temporary was binding on them, but is not binding on us.  Any command that is universal and eternal was binding on them and is binding on us.  Any command that did not bind a specific form of action required the action but not that particular form of action.  Any command that bound a specific form of action required that particular form of action.  From these accepted principles, we conclude the following guidelines.  (a) Any biblical account of action that is backed by a local and temporary command that requred the action, but  did not trequire he particular form of       action, bound the action but not the specific form on them, but does not bind even the action  on us. (b) Any biblical account of action that is backed by a universal and eternal  command that required the action, but  did not requier the particular form of action, bound the action but not the specific form on them, and also binds the action (but not the particular form) on us. (c) Any biblical account of action that is backed by a local and teporary command that requredboth the action and particular form of action, bound the action and the specific form on them, but does not bind action nor form on us. (d)  Any biblical account of action that is backed by a universal and eternal  command that required both the action andparticular form of action, bound the action and the specific form on them, and also binds the action and particular form on us.

5.  When considering an imperative involving a particular form of expression, look for indicators in the passage concerning whether the form is dictated by some supracultural core principle of Christianity or eternal moral principle (e.g., love for neighbor, Christ’s death for sin, the resurrection of Christ.)

6.  If we can determine how much the underlying core principle and the application overlap, then we have insight into the extent to which the particulars of the application are binding.  For example, the form of baptism greatly overlaps with the fact that it is an expression of faith in the reality of the death, burial, and resurrection of Christ and a declaration of faith in the efficacy of the death, burial, and resurrection in giving us a new life in Christ (Rom. 6).  On the other hand, there is no more overlap between the cultural expression of love by a “holy kiss” than there is between the expression of love by a handshake.

7.  When a teaching transcends the cultural forms of the author and first readers, it is very likely not rmative.  Conversely, when a command is wholly tied to a cultural situation, it does not constitute a timeless norm

8.  Commands that involve morals or theology are closely tied to and reflecting of the changeless nature of God.  Therefore, they are as timeless and universal in their application as God is timeless and universal in his nature and authority.

9.  Observe what the New Testament presents as inherently moral or immoral (e.g. 1 Cor. 6:9-10; Gal. 5:19-26).

10.  Observe whether there were other possible forms of expression (cultural options) availiable or if the particular form found in the text was the only one available.  This raises the question concerning whether the author had a divine mandate (i.e., background command or antecedent theology) to choose this particular form as       exclusive and binding (e.g., baptism).

11.  Observe whether a change in form had divine mandate (subsequent command or theology) that required or demanded the change.  Any norm that is changed or repealed by subsequent revelation (i.e., later biblical writers) is changed or repealed for us (e.g., keeping of the Sabbath).

12.  Observe whether the New Testament itself consistently demonstrates observance of a particular form of action (e.g., the form of baptism).  Consistency implies that the form of action must be nonnegotiable (e.g., baptism by immersion).

13.  We must learn to exercise Christian love and grace toward others who are acting in faith but differ from our conclusions, just as Jesus exercises love and grace toward us as faithful but imperfect people (Rom. 14:1-23; 15:1-7).

14.  We must distinguish whether a particular form was bound upon the first readers or not.  If a form was not binding but just an optional form for them (e.g., baptism in running stream), it is not binding on us.  Likewise, if the form was bound on them because the principle required it to meet the needs of that culture (e.g., greeting by       kissing or footwashing), but the form was cultural rather then supracultural, the form is not bound on us.  However, if the form proves to be both bound and supracultural (e.g., modest dress), it is binding upon us.

15.  We ought to consider the distance between the supracultural principle requiring an action and the form of the action in a particular culture (e.g., Does the supracultural principle of headship given in 1 Corinthians 11:2-16 give normative status to the principle of submission or to the cultural act of wearing a veil to show submission?)

 

© William T. (Bill) Lambert, EdD  (8/01)

Professor Emeritus, Harding University

document-iconDownload Pdf here.

Posted in How to Study the Bible | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Discovery Learning in the Bible